Tsujigiri
Gold Member
- Joined
- May 25, 2009
- Messages
- 3,197
It's not relevant whether they were manual or CNC machinists before getting into the knife industry, nor is it relevant what they are or are not optimizing. What you SAID was:
Which I have not found to be the case at all. Can you provide multiple specific examples?
And yeah, you can make good parts on a cheap machine. Most high end USA-based knife makers however, are NOT using bottom of the barrel machines, as you posited previously. Or does anything not automated automatically fall into that category in your eyes? You seem to be implying that anyone not deeply invested in automation and maximized production output are somehow amateurish, which is of course ridiculous.
It is extremely relevant. Maybe I should have specified production CNC machining. Obviously even the small custom knifemakers will know their way around a manual knee mill, how else would they make anything? That's not what we're talking about. I'm not sure exactly how to explain the distinction to someone not directly involved in manufacturing, but there's very little crossover between these two worlds. And old school tool and die is very much on the manual knee mill side, Mitch is correct with his examples and the majority of knifemakers have a similar background.
Yes they are using bottom of the barrel machines, and no it's not just about automation. There's a broad range of CNC machines on the market, and knifemaking is an area where acceptable tolerances are loose enough that the low end can be acceptable. Haas is bottom of the barrel whether they're automated or not, for a wide variety of reasons. Brother and Robodrill are also common with knife companies, but while these are much better, they are still what's known in the industry as a "commodity machine." They're geared towards lower-end job shops, but there's a whole world of higher end machines beyond that.
