ajnova stated "Quite honestly, it seems pretty (and no offense) stupid, that you and others won't consider and quickly bash liner locks."
Unfortunately thats not always the case as you presume above with many of us as we HAVE carried linerlocks for many years [ in my case anyway ] until I learend the hard way not to carry them through injuriy and failures with various linerlocks.
So many have considered them, owned them, carried them and now, through experiences they have personally with that type of locking mechanism no longer trust them to not fail at the most inopertune time.
Carried linerlocks for over a decade, not any more though. Thats through experiences with bvarious linerlocks, not some lack of consideration.
As to Emersons linerlocks, well, he may be a good friend of yours but in all honesty, his linerlocks are not something I'll consider from experiences with that product line.
See, I sell knives on the side at discount and have had too many Emerson linerlocks come from the factory over the years [ for customers ] not set properly and they fail NIB to be secure enough to not release the lock under spinal stresses/lateral stresses.
Is that something I even want to contend with in a folder I carry which may have to be called on to defend my butt? I think you know the answer to that already.
I've never met Ernie, I'm sure he is a consumate professional and gentleman, but that does not negate the fact that many of his linerlocking folders leave much top be desired where lock strength is concerned.
And yes, I agree, it is cutting myself off from a lot of nice designs and makes of folders by not carrying linerlocking folders. Thats no problem here as there are some very good folders that are not linerlocks on the market and that trend seems to be growing every year. Plenty to choose from that are not linerlocks.
My EDC's are not wanting for lack of linerlocks. No, I would not carry the AR or GB either [ they are linerlocks ]. Now give me an SMF or SnG, no problem.
Brownie