Hi Sal and Lamarrk,
Thanks to both of you gentlemen for your thoughtful responses. The knife law link is an excellent state by state summary and I have made sure to save it to my hard drive. I had been able to read the quite lengthy knife laws of New York State and determined that the Military is good for daily carry in the entire state, as I don't use drugs of any sort, which is one of their explicit criterion for determining if a carried knife is considered illegal. The one exception, as you very clearly point out Lamarrk, is NYC....all bets are off there. However, after one ploughs through all the legal details and case law precedent, it essentially comes down to having to be conscious of blade length when travelling to NYC. The Military, having a 4" blade length, is a no no in NYC. The remainder of New York State is fine, just not NYC. The law states that a blade length of "4" or greater" is not permitted. So I am now in the market for a slightly smaller knife for NYC trips. Naturally, automatics are prohibitted throughout the entire state, regardless of length or drug habits.
The knife law chart you provided Lamarrk is really an excellent summary, thank you, and it also includes the important case precedents determined for each state. I was able to find those precedents listed in your chart that apply to New York State and they are correct. One point, it states 4" in the column under the heading "Blade Length Limits". This could be a little confusing as a 4" blade limit actually exceeds NYC law given the precise wording which restricts, "4 inches or greater". Certainly, it is important to do one's homework before carrying a knife in unchartered waters. Good point Sal when travelling abroad. Places like England don't take kindly to nail clippers let alone Military model Spydercos.
Lamarrk, I appreciate your perspective being a retired Alabama State trooper and agree with everything you said about NYC and gun carry. I have many friends in the NYPD as well as retired NYPD and find their gun law restrictions to be as far off base as possible. Retired NYPD officers can't even carry in NYC without department approval. These are the good guys, as are your Alabama troopers, who are assisting officers in NYC...so they arrest them when they should be commending them. What they and every other anti-gun activist group doesn't comprehend, is that the people who are law abiding citizens, who take the time to be finger printed (and pay $99 for the privilege by the way when criminals have it done for free), take an 8 hour gun safety training course (about $75), have an FBI and state background check performed, have 4 non-relatives who must reside in the same county as you write references for you and have each reference notorized, have photographs taken ($20) and apply for a CCW license ($15) are not the problem. These people are law abiding. These are the people NYC does not permit to carry a firearm. Meanwhile the bad guys, who by definition have absolutely no intent on abiding by any law whatsoever, will continue to procure illegal guns, carry them, and use them against defenseless citizens. The good law abiding citizen, who has just been scrutinized for four months, beyond all reasonable limits and passed this scrutiny, is restricted and not allowed to protect himself from the punks and scum of the earth who could care less about human life. I just don't get it and never will.
My CCW is valid anywhere in the State of New York as well as 14 other states. However, if I am carrying a pistol while driving into or through NYC, I have to pull over before entering NYC and remove my pistol and make sure it is locked in a box in my trunk with the ammunition locked in a separate location. I suddenly have ceased to become a law abiding citizen in NYC? Someone please enlighten me.
Thanks for bearing with my diatribe but I find the argument exhausting and frustrating to say the least. I'd love to hear other's viewpoints on this issue as New York is not alone in these ludicrous gun laws.
As an addendum, I just wanted to point out that crime statistics have proven that cities and states that have these restrictive gun laws actually experience higher crime rates than those that allow concealed carry. I see it as elementary that bad guys know that in concealed carry states there is a possibility that they may select the wrong law abiding citizen to perform a criminal attack. This unknown factor puts doubt in the criminals' mind and acts as a deterrent. Conversely, in those cities and states where it is clear that the honest, law abiding citizen has no chance to arm his or her self that the bad guy has no fear element facing him and will boldly proceed with his intended crime.
Thanks.