The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
Well the new generation PM process that Carpenter uses makes the carbide distribution much more refined, so the edge holding is very similar to AEB-L with better than D2 wear resistance, though I notice it rusts like D2 as well.
I've heard Niolox is also like AEB-L, but with better wear resistance and very good corrosion resistance despite the lower chromium content.
Well the new generation PM process that Carpenter uses makes the carbide distribution much more refined, so the edge holding is very similar to AEB-L with better than D2 wear resistance, though I notice it rusts like D2 as well.
I've heard Niolox is also like AEB-L, but with better wear resistance and very good corrosion resistance despite the lower chromium content.
Not sure about edge deformation as the problem usually results in tiny chips, which I presume would be large carbide chunks chipping out. In every piece of documentation I read, the PM process is supposed to make the steel tougher compared to their normal counterparts.Correct me if I am wrong but a more even carbide distribution has the real-world benefit of making the edge deformation more even as the knife is used and avoiding 'hot spots'...which indirectly increases impact resistance by reducing weaker spots that are the most vulnerable part of the blade to catastrophic failure...simultaneously, it makes the knife easier to sharpen despite such improvements in performance as the steel is more consistent throughout the blade. Is that correct?
If so, would the change in the processes of making CTS-XHP theoretically give the same type of performance improvement that S35VN gives over S30V in regards to a more consistent level of wear, greater toughness, and easier sharpening?
While I doubt my term 'hot spots' is correct, I am trying to refer to the issue of when small spots on the edge do not wear at the same rate of the rest of the knife (and can be a pain to sharpen), which I find to be incredibly annoying. And it's why I have taking a liking to Blue/White steel as I find it to wear very evenly. I have noticed this hot spotting mainly on large fixed blades (including larger kitchen knives)...any idea why that is?
I thought AEB-L didn't have much in the way of carbides? At least relative to something like 440C. From what I understand, more carbides tend to get in the way of a finer edge, and niobium and vanadium carbides are typically smaller than chromium carbides(at least according to Crucible). Though I haven't heard anyone claim that Niolox takes a finer edge than AEB-L, I guess it would be accurate to call it something between AEB-L and D2? Though if the wear resistance is already at D2 levels, then I'd consider it to be better.Achim Wirtz, who distributes the Lohmann steels to knifemakers and has even has some custom melts done (bringing back 115W8/1.2442 tool steel from the gave for one) chastised me when I told him that I had heard that Niolox was like better AEB-L.He said that they are not really similar, but the Niolox was well on its way to dominating the food service equipment industry in Germany. AEB-L has incredibly fine grain and very fine carbides. Niolox has bigger and HARDER carbides, but not huge ones like D2 and it still has very fine aus grain because of the Niobium.
Not sure about edge deformation as the problem usually results in tiny chips, which I presume would be large carbide chunks chipping out. In every piece of documentation I read, the PM process is supposed to make the steel tougher compared to their normal counterparts.
From what I could personally observe, Elmax and M390 both seem to take a mirror polish easier than S30V and other equivalents which might have less vanadium carbides, and I find them both easier to sharpen as well.
As for the fixed blades, I'm not sure why it would happen. They should both come from bar or plate stock. Though typically kitchen knives should normally be a higher hardness than pocket knives as they aren't expected to be put through any hard or potentially abusive use like batoning or prying, so that might be a possible contributing factor.
I thought AEB-L didn't have much in the way of carbides? At least relative to something like 440C. From what I understand, more carbides tend to get in the way of a finer edge, and niobium and vanadium carbides are typically smaller than chromium carbides(at least according to Crucible). Though I haven't heard anyone claim that Niolox takes a finer edge than AEB-L, I guess it would be accurate to call it something between AEB-L and D2? Though if the wear resistance is already at D2 levels, then I'd consider it to be better.
Michael, I soaked a 3V knife in vinegar once for over 24 hours and it developed zero patina. When I got my first piece of 3V from AKS Chuck told me to grind it thin. I was skeptical, but it really does handle that thin edge very efficiently. The only thing I am not a huge fan of with 3V is the difficulty in finishing.