i have always wondered about the blade grind, never having handled any kind of mora.
the normal scandi grind makes alot of sense to me, for all the reasons that everyone likes it, but i just can't wrap my mind around the M2K grind. as far as i can tell from the pictures, the main wood working edge, the part next to the handle, is traditional scandi ground, but then the blade looks like it transitions to a full hollow grind, with a very small edge bevel.
one of the things that people seem to really like about the mora is that even if you have sharpened it a thousand times, you still have the exact same overall edge profile that you started with on day one. with other grinds, the edge gets thinner and then thicker with sharpening (hollow) or the edge just gets thicker (flat grind) or the blade gets thinner, maintaining the same ratios of edge thickness, but with an overall loss of stock thickness (convex)
when you toss the hollow grind into the front of the knife (if it is that...or perhaps a flat grind?) then you will have, in theory, over time, a thicker edge in the tip half of the blade and the same edge thickness in the handle half of the blade.
it just doesn't make sense to do something like that when one of the most favored reasons for liking scandi grinds is that the edge never gets thicker.
and, if it is hollow ground, then the tip will be relatively thin, compared to a normal full to the tip scandi grind. this would seem to me counter-active to the intended use as a survival knife, when you want a thicker tip for battoning firewood or for prying chips out of the bowl of a spoon (yes i know more bushcraft than survival) frankly it makes more sense to me to have a thicker tip on a survival knife so that it can take abuse.
i don't want to argue with anyone, i have never used a mora and can't claim to say that they are inferior, in fact i hope to be purchasing one soon. i am just trying to figure out what is up with the grind.