- Joined
- Oct 11, 2013
- Messages
- 21,971
Andrew, excellent post. Beautiful dog, too!
You nailed it right here:
At the end of the day, I am not judging Mr. Maringer (too harshly). I understand fully that there IS a difference between there being a possible scenario in your mind, and the visceral reality of that scenario coming to pass. I took a look at Mr. Maringer's work on his site and found all of it beautiful, so he is clearly an artisan of note. Frankly, I am glad that there are makers out there who continue to design knives with SD purposes in mind. I can only imagine how many people carry such a knife and can feel safer as a result, who might live in jurisdictions where they can't carry a firearm.
You nailed it right here:
If you're designing knives to be used in violence then you should be able to rationalise and justify that within your moral system or you shouldn't really be doing it. Furthermore if your knives are not designed with the intent of being used for violence then you should still grasp the possibility that they innately still have a high effectiveness in violence if used in such a manner, regardless of the designer's wishes. In this case you should still be able to rationalise and justify this potential outcome within your moral compass. many designers would say that refusing to recognise this potential ethical issue is inherently irresponsible.
At the end of the day, I am not judging Mr. Maringer (too harshly). I understand fully that there IS a difference between there being a possible scenario in your mind, and the visceral reality of that scenario coming to pass. I took a look at Mr. Maringer's work on his site and found all of it beautiful, so he is clearly an artisan of note. Frankly, I am glad that there are makers out there who continue to design knives with SD purposes in mind. I can only imagine how many people carry such a knife and can feel safer as a result, who might live in jurisdictions where they can't carry a firearm.