Not traditional.
Why not? If I post a picture of one here it won't get moved to a different sub.Not traditional.
True. My opinion only, I guess. Looks like a hybrid to me, and I just don't like them. To each his own. I am glad there is such a diversity of knives out there. But I have my preferences.Why not? If I post a picture of one here it won't get moved to a different sub.
Yeah I don't like lots of stuff too but I"m not sure if that's the best way to categorize them.True. My opinion only, I guess. Looks like a hybrid to me, and I just don't like them. To each his own. I am glad there is such a diversity of knives out there. But I have my preferences.
It would seem that they agree with me. Modern slipjoint? Sure, I'll buy that. Modern traditional? Nope, nada, no way.
Before I even opened this thread it was the smaller lockback Grohmann knife that jumped to mind. How the handle swells gives it a better feeling in the hand and the weight is very nice.. I wish Grohmann would offer a few more handle material options though. But still no on the pry bar use.
It is a category at bladehq
“Modern Traditionals” is a pretty widely used term these days. They describe a knife with similar looks and function as a traditional slipjoint, maybe even using a tried and true pattern such as a barlow, but uses modern materials such as titanium, carbon fiber, and modern steels such as s30v and m390.
https://www.bladehq.com/cat--Modern-Traditional-Pocket-Knives--3446
It is a category at bladehq
I don't make a habit of emulating the ignorant, lazy, or ill-informed.
I looked at every page, and with the exception of a couple customs every single one of those knives was either 100% traditional ( Victorinox and GEC ) or was a 100% modern knife that happened to be a slipjoint.
It will never be agreed upon, but I've just never seen a knife that fits this description and don't think I ever will.