- Joined
- Apr 11, 2001
- Messages
- 2,978
First of I would like to give a big "Thank You" to Spyderco, Sal G., and anyone associated with Spyderco that made this possible..... as far as I know this is a rare happening for a company to do something like this... rare for any company....... but ground breaking in the knife industry as far as I know.
It is also a rare opportunity for us, the end user to be involved. We get to try different steels at a very, very economical prices.... the only way many will ever get the chance to have them.
That said, I do hope we on the receiving end keep this in mind. Opinions are like posteriors.... everybody has one. When they are asked for, as Sal has graciously done as he contemplates which steels to use...... by all means give your opinions as he asked.
However, when the decision has been made..... go with it.... whatever it is. Don't moan & groan & gripe & cry or get mad. Don't say with your lip poked out.... I just won't get it to "heck" with it .....
Go with the choice..... support this project.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The below, I copied & pasted here from the Spyderco Forum........ any enhancements & color ... I added myself ........
-------
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
#46 Yesterday, 05:54 PM
gaj999
Registered User Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by sal
We'll need to improve the way they go out. Too much stress and error on this first release. If we do a "pre sign up", we'll have to do a deposit thing, combined with record keeping really adds more processing costs.
sal
How much complexity is added if we give SFO a credit card number with the understanding that when a new mule is ready, it will be shipped to us and our card will be charged? I'm more than willing to do this and it would reduce my fear of missing out on a run. It adds risk for those who want to pick and choose runs and gives some priority to those who are willing to commit to one(or more) of each, but all systems have trade offs. At least this way, you don't have to mess with deposits. The burden of updating CC info when cards expire would mostly fall on the customer, although SFO would have to be involved to some extent. One benefit of this approach is perhaps a better feel for the number of mules that are pretty certain to sell, which could be important if some steels are going to need to have bigger runs.
Gordon
*****************************************
This above is a concern Sal posted and a reply by Gordon ..."gaj999". You can read it for yourself ans below are my simple thoughts.
Of course I have no connedtion with Spyderco beyond being an end user, just like most of you reading this.
However, as I have stated earkier...... I appreciate greatly what they are doing here. I also recognise their need to keep it as simple as possible for a project of this magnitude..... because they are trying to keep the cost down to us, the end user.
LET US NOT FORGET THAT Folks........
I personally will commit to this project no matter what the steel is.... for as many as you do each year ... for as long as you do them. no questions asked.
I have a feeling I am not alone in that thought either.
I trust the FSO enough to give them my Credit Card information when I order. So I surely would trust them enough to keep it on file, charge the card, and send me the knives when they come out. I personally don't care if you inform me or not. Just send them on ....
If we need to or have the option to pay up front..... that would be fine also with me... preferred even.
Anyway, I for one am willing to do whatever you all need too be done to make this function in a smooth way as far as distribution goes.... or anything else for that matter.
Again, to all involved with Spyderco.... Thank You.
To all of us "end users"....... please let us remember this is a rare opportunity we have........ let's not screw it up.....
Ya'll have a good one......... :thumbup:
The above thoughts are mine... except fpr the quotes...
If you agree .... good.
If you don't .... sorry
However, in the end the "final call"... will be made by Spyderco ... let's help in any way we can to make it go smooth........ :thumbup:
It is also a rare opportunity for us, the end user to be involved. We get to try different steels at a very, very economical prices.... the only way many will ever get the chance to have them.
That said, I do hope we on the receiving end keep this in mind. Opinions are like posteriors.... everybody has one. When they are asked for, as Sal has graciously done as he contemplates which steels to use...... by all means give your opinions as he asked.
However, when the decision has been made..... go with it.... whatever it is. Don't moan & groan & gripe & cry or get mad. Don't say with your lip poked out.... I just won't get it to "heck" with it .....
Go with the choice..... support this project.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The below, I copied & pasted here from the Spyderco Forum........ any enhancements & color ... I added myself ........
-------
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
#46 Yesterday, 05:54 PM
gaj999
Registered User Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by sal
We'll need to improve the way they go out. Too much stress and error on this first release. If we do a "pre sign up", we'll have to do a deposit thing, combined with record keeping really adds more processing costs.
sal
How much complexity is added if we give SFO a credit card number with the understanding that when a new mule is ready, it will be shipped to us and our card will be charged? I'm more than willing to do this and it would reduce my fear of missing out on a run. It adds risk for those who want to pick and choose runs and gives some priority to those who are willing to commit to one(or more) of each, but all systems have trade offs. At least this way, you don't have to mess with deposits. The burden of updating CC info when cards expire would mostly fall on the customer, although SFO would have to be involved to some extent. One benefit of this approach is perhaps a better feel for the number of mules that are pretty certain to sell, which could be important if some steels are going to need to have bigger runs.
Gordon
*****************************************
This above is a concern Sal posted and a reply by Gordon ..."gaj999". You can read it for yourself ans below are my simple thoughts.
Of course I have no connedtion with Spyderco beyond being an end user, just like most of you reading this.
However, as I have stated earkier...... I appreciate greatly what they are doing here. I also recognise their need to keep it as simple as possible for a project of this magnitude..... because they are trying to keep the cost down to us, the end user.
LET US NOT FORGET THAT Folks........
I personally will commit to this project no matter what the steel is.... for as many as you do each year ... for as long as you do them. no questions asked.
I have a feeling I am not alone in that thought either.
I trust the FSO enough to give them my Credit Card information when I order. So I surely would trust them enough to keep it on file, charge the card, and send me the knives when they come out. I personally don't care if you inform me or not. Just send them on ....
If we need to or have the option to pay up front..... that would be fine also with me... preferred even.
Anyway, I for one am willing to do whatever you all need too be done to make this function in a smooth way as far as distribution goes.... or anything else for that matter.
Again, to all involved with Spyderco.... Thank You.
To all of us "end users"....... please let us remember this is a rare opportunity we have........ let's not screw it up.....
Ya'll have a good one......... :thumbup:
The above thoughts are mine... except fpr the quotes...
If you agree .... good.
If you don't .... sorry
However, in the end the "final call"... will be made by Spyderco ... let's help in any way we can to make it go smooth........ :thumbup: