My grail knife, Michael Raymond Estrella Integral Frame lock!

Joined
Mar 1, 1999
Messages
1,904
I have been EDCing my Michael Raymond Estrella for a few weeks now and thought I'd post a mini review.

DSC00730.jpg


Fit and finish on this knife is absolutely impeccable! The blade action is glassy smooth. Both the lock up as well as the closing detent is bank vault solid. I love the feeling of this knife locking up! I own a Scott Cook Lochsa and the Estrella compares very favorably. The Estrella also has better ergonomics for my small to medium sized hands than the Lochsa.

Michael's knives use phosphor bronze pivot bushings as well as large phosphor bronze washers. A lot of newer knives use bearings. I am personally not a fan of bearings -- they are more easily gunked up in the field, they cannot take as much lateral stress, and they are more difficult to disassemble/reassemble. With the pivot bushing system, the washers are held in place by the bushing so they automatically line up with the pivot hole. This allows for effortless reassembly by the user. More importantly, with this type of pivot, all one needs to do is tighten down the screw and the action will be perfect every time. There is no Loctite needed, no need to worry about the screw loosening over time, and no need to fiddle with the screw to find the correct tension. In my opinion, pivot assemblies made this way are superior to other methods. Making a pivot this way is also more expensive and difficult to manufacture than a bearing system which is why we so rarely see it on a knife. Unfortunately, even Chris Reeve is moving away from this type of pivot.

DSC00671.jpg


The pivot female end as well as the pivot screw is also handmade by Michael.

DSC00665.jpg


The finish on the inside of the knife, which obviously can only be seen when the knife is disassembled, is just as good as the outside, a true mark of fine craftsmanship. You can tell a lot about the precision and quality of a knife by taking it apart, the Estrella certainly does not disappoint.

The Estrella comes with a titanium take down tool, which Michael also makes, a work of art in of itself.

TakedownTool.jpg


Made from very few parts, a true integral frame lock!

DSC00663.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Gorgeous knife! Someday, maybe I'll get one. Thanks for the review!

Just saw the Starlit on his website. I think that's my new knife to lust over.
 
I'd like to see a photo of the lock engagement, if you feel so inclined.

Best Regards,

STeven Garsson
 
Steven,
If you prefer the earlier engagement because it may increase lock life, I would not worry. If you ask Chris Reeve how many of his titanium frame locks he has had come back that have worn out due to the lock bar wearing across the blade tang, I suspect the answer might be zero; and this is with sebenzas having a 50-70% lock engagement. Many on the forums feel that an early engagement on a titanium frame lock means a longer lock life. This belief probably stemmed from the days when knife companies such as Benchmade were just starting to use titanium liner locks and they would not heat treat or harden them in any way. Soft titanium on hardened steel would obviously wear quite rapidly.

A frame lock with hardened titanium will not wear in the way many people think, slowly moving across the tang. A person may even wear out the ceramic ball bearing before the lock bar ever moves enough to hit the other handle scale.
 
Steven,
If you prefer the earlier engagement because it may increase lock life, I would not worry. If you ask Chris Reeve how many of his titanium frame locks he has had come back that have worn out due to the lock bar wearing across the blade tang, I suspect the answer might be zero; and this is with sebenzas having a 50-70% lock engagement.

At one point, I owned about six CRK Sebenza knives, and now I only have a small with serial number.......simply put, I don't care for the lock engagement of Sebenza knives at all.....and Benchmade, Kershaw, Scott Cook and anyone else producing a framelock are judged by similar criteria....if I can manually push the lockbar past the halfway point, I don't want the knife, and don't care who made it....ymmv.

Best Regards,

STeven Garsson
 
Amazing knife, I had just gotten over the Sebenza bug before I found out about Scott Cook and Michael Raymond knives; my wallet hurts already and I feel the obsession coming back...
These are absolutely beautiful, anyways. If you had the choice to get a lochsa or Estrella, which would you get? I really don't like the Lochsa pocket clip with the 3 screws, but if I ordered either I don't think I would want a pocket clip.
 
At one point, I owned about six CRK Sebenza knives, and now I only have a small with serial number.......simply put, I don't care for the lock engagement of Sebenza knives at all.....

Well since Reeve is credited with inventing the frame lock, and then perfecting it over the years, I'll gladly trust his judgement on how much engagement is optimum for a production knife.
 
There are many, many examples of knives that benefit from improvements....just because the maker originated it, doesn't mean it cannot be improved upon.

Be a sheep if you want, let the "masters" sell you what they can, no reason for questions if that is your state of mind.....critical thinking is for critical thinkers.

The Lochsa would never have existed if Scott Cook had not worked at CRK....however....I would say that knife has a number of interesting features that represent an improvement of the Sebenza.

Randall Knives made a name doing their thing, and some consider them "the best"...what they are the best of is arguable...maybe holding and increasing value? Certainly not performance.

Best Regards,

STeven Garsson
 
There are many, many examples of knives that benefit from improvements....just because the maker originated it, doesn't mean it cannot be improved upon.

Be a sheep if you want, let the "masters" sell you what they can, no reason for questions if that is your state of mind.....critical thinking is for critical thinkers.

The Lochsa would never have existed if Scott Cook had not worked at CRK....however....I would say that knife has a number of interesting features that represent an improvement of the Sebenza.

Randall Knives made a name doing their thing, and some consider them "the best"...what they are the best of is arguable...maybe holding and increasing value? Certainly not performance.

Best Regards,

STeven Garsson
I just don't know why you would want to take away lockup strength for an earlier engagement, when the knife has a reputation to not visibly wear in the lock whatsoever.
 
I just don't know why you would want to take away lockup strength for an earlier engagement, when the knife has a reputation to not visibly wear in the lock whatsoever.

Like I said, I carried them for years. Supposed to be a hard use knife, right?

Well, when used hard, I found with a strong grip, I was driving the lockbar over to almost the opposite side of the tang, and it was binding....so I couldn't close it one handed anymore. It got to be annoying. Lotta box cutting, cutting packing straps, shrink wrap...., balancing on top of stacks of crap in refrigerators and freezers, and one-handed closing got to be a necessity, not a preference.

Tried the pencil trick, using Flourinated grease.......nothing really helped.

The small one I kept is a salute to genius of the design itself....the knife performed reasonably well, at a time when I was not using them as hard and finally, Scott Cook did the "spa" treatment when he worked at CRK, so it's kinda special.

Obviously, YMMV.

Best Regards,

STeven Garsson
 
There are many, many examples of knives that benefit from improvements....just because the maker originated it, doesn't mean it cannot be improved upon.

Be a sheep if you want, let the "masters" sell you what they can, no reason for questions if that is your state of mind.....critical thinking is for critical thinkers.

Randall Knives made a name doing their thing, and some consider them "the best"...what they are the best of is arguable...maybe holding and increasing value? Certainly not performance.

Well that's a lot of air. First, Reeves has improved on sebenza over the years. Just because I respect his design and manufacturing abilities does not mean I am not a critical thinker. Finally, Randall knives have been proven in the school of hard use since WWII, guess that's not enough for a "critical thinker" like Kohai99. Just because you are an "expert" does not make you right.
 
How about a pic to get this back on topic.

nice review JohnyKwst - i completely agree with your review. also, i think the Starlit nicely deals with the Estrella's only shortcoming - the pocket clip.
btw - have you ever been by Advanced Cutlery in Arcadia? one of the guys who works there is a big MR fan.

weDAaLj.jpg
 
Back
Top