
I had asked a while ago for a comparison on the two. Well I broke down and ordered them both.
I have to say I am very disappointed in the Leatherman. I have several multi-tools. This is my first leatherman though.
The blade is very dull. Not that big of a deal. I usually sharpen a knife as soon as I get it anyway. The knife blade has pretty much no resistance as far as opening or closing it. I can open it just by using my thumb. I worry a little about haw easy it closes.
The point on the awl is not as sharp as the SAK.
Unlike the blade, the scissors are crammed in and almost seem bent to fit into the space. You can hear them scraping against the sides when taking them out or putting them in.
The screw driver bits are hard to get out but I had heard of this problem and with use perhaps they will become easier.
The pliers and all the tools in this small of a package are the CS4's best attributes.
I am sadly disappointed in my first leatherman. The quality seems so poor I am almost curious as to if it is a knockoff.
On to the Vic Handyman.
It's blade and all implements seem superior to the leatherman. My gripes with the Victorinox are the tools on the bottom are difficult to get to because the cork screw is in the way and it's size.
It doesn't seem as bulky as I thought it would when carrying it in my pocket but the thickness of the knife make it clunky to use.
Overall I would have to go with the Victorinox. Even though the pliers on the Leatherman are much more useful the rest of the leatherman is no where near up to the quality of the SAK.
I am not trying to antagonize LM fans. I was truly expecting for the Juice to come out the winner. I was very excited to get this multi-tool. The quality of the item was just a big dissapointment. So bad in fact like I said I wonder if it's a knock off, but I don't think it is.