- Joined
- Nov 18, 2005
- Messages
- 7,425
I doubt there's much real world difference, but I wouldn't go so far as to say structurally identical. Since the 'zaan is held together at two points and has no stop bar, the pivot hardware is the main "structure" of the knife. While the pivot diameter is the same, the old "lug" has a wider span and more contact area with the frame, so it follows that pushed to the point of failure, the old setup should be somewhat stronger. Again, this is likely an academic point with little if any real world application, but it helps me to rationalize my (aesthetic) preference for the older style.
I really think that's academic at best. At the point at which that might become relevant, one or more other parts of the knife are likely to have failed. It's sort of a question about how pretty the corpse is.
