New HI D-Handle Khukuri

Joined
Dec 28, 2003
Messages
4,793
Warning! This is going to be one of my patented long ones...:D Going to take this post and the next.

_____________________

A couple of weeks ago Yangdu dropped me a line and told me to expect a copy of the newest HI model in the mail, and I finally pried the package loose from the PO yesterday. (3 days after it arrived...!)

I pulled the wraps off the handle and beheld a piece of exposed chandan that was the single nicest piece of wood I think I have seen from HI. It must have been the same stuff Steve spoke about on the Patang. It was Chandan with beautiful lines and swirls in it, and it was attached to an... Uddha sword! It was the sword I got on the deals about a week ago. I had thought I was looking at the wood on the new model, but that was not to be. Still, I was thrilled to get it on the sword.

The second package was of normal khukuri length but far wider that I expected. There was a note with it (along with a nice postcard!) from Bura that said "Chandan D-handle khukuri scabbard split; Sending Satisal instead."

I was disapppointed a bit at first after seeing that other Chandan and imagining that the same batch might have been used for this (one of you guys is in for a treat!), but then I got a look at this amazing satisal. Really nice stuff and very rich looking.

To the knife: it is a D-handle khukuri that has the same blade shape as the ultimate fighter essentially, but is attached to a great handle. Like the Patang Steve Ferguson reported on, it is an adaptation of an older HI model that is featured in the "Special Runs" section of the HI website. Scroll about halfway down to see the old version of this. Specs aren't given but I imagine it was much heavier then:

http://www.himalayan-imports.com/one-time-knives.html

This model is a joy to hold and better balanced than just about anything I have, which I guess is to be expected considering the handle. Here are the specs: 15.75" long, weighing 31.4 oz., or 1.99 oz. / inch. It is an exact .40 (10 mm.) at the spine for about half the blade length, and then sweeps down to a sharpened clip point. The handle is 5.25" long and the blade an even 10.5". The edge is very sharp and when I say the clip point is sharpened I mean it! Not like the UBE or Movie Models at all. Very potent fighter here.

The blade is 1.44" wide at the cho, and goes to a max of 1.95" from the top of the clip point to the belly in just one spot, and then goes to 1.92" at it's widest point at the belly of the knife.

The knife balances exactly at the cho. The handle is supported by twin brass bolsters that are scrolled with engraving very nicely. Note the difference between the old model in this regard. The karda and chakmak are standard and done in the same dark wood. The scabbard fit is excellent. Watch the clip point going into the scabbard a bit, but not nearly as much as the Movie Model.

The brass work is excellent, and as I said the Satisal is something else. One note: there was a dark line through the TDC of the handle, right through some nice grain. It looks exactly as it someone had taken a black sharpie and drawn on the handle in a layout line. I took some 600 grit sandpaper and worked on it for an hour last night. The line faded in one spot but then got darker in some others. I finally took a good look at it through a 30X loupe and am convinced now that it is just some odd grain in the wood. It blends perfectly with some existing black grain lines in the wood, and under magnification you can see the edges of the line are blurred into the surrounding grain, not straight. 600 grit is sharper than you think, and the line was not diminishing. I can tell you it drove me nuts for a while until I looked at it more closely. It's an interesting anomaly in the wood that adds some character to the handle. I finished the handle off with some 3200 and 6000 grit mesh, and it looks better than ever.

A second note is that if I had to name this wood at a quick glance I would have said hill walnut because of the grain, but it has that golden tinge that only satisal can have.

The knife handles like a part of your hand. Swipes and reverse cuts are easy with this knife, as your hand is totally supported. The next time I'm sent on a deck clearing mission by my Captain I'll be well prepared! :thumbup: :D

I know some folks are going to comment about the 90 degree brass hooks sticking up, but they have zero interference with using the knife. It is actually very difficult for them to get in the way no matter how you hold it.

I took a bunch of pics but narrowed it down to these 8. I may have overdone it, but wanted you to see the spine and butt, etc. Pic #4 shows the spine and also has a nice clear shot of the handle grain. The first two are my wife holding it as I wanted a side view. She was ready to use it on me after seeing the Uddha (Another @#$% knife!?!), but I said she should go buy herself some new shoes as the new ones she got last week are looking a bit faded, so she is temporarily mollified...;)

attachment.php


attachment.php


attachment.php


attachment.php


attachment.php


I am really psyched at all the great new and old/new models coming out of HI these days. The 18" BDC, the big pen, the Ultimate Fighter, the Patang, talk now of a long-desired 18" Balance, and now this, the D-Handled Khukuri!

Thanks so much to Yangdu and HI for the chance to give a report on this outstanding model! :thumbup:

Best Regards,

Norm
 
Here are a few more pictures of the knife. The last one shows the new knife in relation to some others so you owners of those knives can have a basis of reference and comparison.

From left to right: 9.5" 10 oz. horn karambit, 10.25" 7 oz. neem KK, 14" 21 oz. antler BDC, the 15.75" 31 oz. D-handle, a 16.5" 29 oz. chandan CAK, a 17" 27 oz. antler M43, a 20" 23 oz. Cherokee Rose, and a 20" 28 oz. neem Jange.

It is easy to see that the closest in handling to this would be the standard CAK, so imagine that blade with a heavier D-handle but faster blade and you about have it.

attachment.php


attachment.php


attachment.php


In closing, all I can say is that if you love HI knives and want a great addition to your collection you have to get one of these! :eek:

(Final Note: it is the exact same weight as a standard Jange but feels much lighter because of the balance.)

Thanks again Yangdu.

Norm
 
Wow.

I don't usually care for D-handled knives, and I didn't care for the UF, but the two look very right together, actually. :thumbup:

John
 
:eek:

That is one beautiful blade. Just by looking at those pics, you can feel how solid it would be in the hand. Great review and great pics, thanks.
 
WOW what a great review, thanks Norm. Awesome photos and I'm sure only a small portion of your collection as well. Simply beauties!!!!

I think I love that 9.5" 10 oz. horn karambit!!!!

Oh man I better get some sleep!

B
 
WOW! :eek: Lookit that!

Not everybody's cup of tea, but very cool.

Awesome pix... thanks, Norm.

and "20" 28 oz. neem Jange"

that one is a prize. I got my fin on for one like that.


Mike
 
Beautiful knife there!! I love D guard knives in general. Great write up on this fine blade also. It is fun going over a new aquisition and trying to come up with all of the info others might want/need to help them decide in owning one also. Sort of a new buyers guide on a blade when it is released.
As an aside I have always wondered what the Rose would look like with a D guard.:o
 
Very interesting.

I wonder about the size of the D guard. Would it not be as effective at protecting the hand if it were somewhat smaller? As it is, if something hits it it will exert a considerable torque on the knife. It's hard to tell without feeling the knife though.

Nicely done false edge. The shape of the blade is more appropriate than a traditional khuk for a false edge. It would be interesting to see how bowie techniques adapt to this knife.

One of the reasons James Keating told me he didn't personally care for the khukuri was it's lack of defensive capabilities. His style emphasises not getting hurt, while the khukuri lends itself to a more offensive style. This knife seems to address Keating's concern.
 
I wondered about the size of the hand guard too. IT reminded me of the oversize trigger guards found on military weapons for winter use because of gloves.



munk
 
You needed something *that* unique for your collection Norm...Congrats!
 
Beatiful knife and nice photos. You are getting good with the camera.

Does the upward extension of the D guard at the butcap affect handling of the knife? I would think that it would be perfect if the guard didn't extend above the handle at the very end, but you can't tell without picking it up.

Looks really nice.
 
Well norm that is one impressive looking khuk. Is it me or has HI done really well in reducing cho creep lately. The knives I've gotten of late have had really pretty ricasso areas with properly placed cho. Really nice review, and your pics just get better and better. Can't wait to see your unbelievably cool website showing your collection. Hint. When its done it will be my home page, I promise.
 
Wow, that's really something. Not for everybody, but what a unique piece. The angular nature of the brass guard has a Tibetan look to me. I agree with those who said the photos are very good! The workmanship is superb. Beautiful wood.

I think I like it.:thumbup:



Thanks for sharing!

Steve
 
Superb effort by the kamis. Glad to see they are attempting something different. Thanks for the writeup. You are the MAS ULTIMO SHARK!:D
 
Great pictures and a fine looking knife. I have to agree with the others - the D guard seems a bit large. Overall, very nice. The engraved bolsters add just the right touch of class with all that mirror polish.
 
Great review, Thank you Norm.
 
munk said:
I wondered about the size of the hand guard too. IT reminded me of the oversize trigger guards found on military weapons for winter use because of gloves.



munk

Yep, first thing I thought when I saw it, and you and Howard and Kazeryu also focused on it. The guard could be a bit closer to the knuckles, maybe as much as 3/4" but on another level it seems to help to balance the knife and gives you room to move your fingers if necessary or wearing gloves. I have held D-handles that only worked when you gripped the handle tightly. If you opened your hand at all your fingers hit the guard. Given that the kamis probably all think we're huge given the knives we buy this is understandable.:D

I should have taken a pic of the knife in my hand and I think those concerns would not have been raised. There is far less room between knuckles and guard when I am holding it, and others here have larger hands than me. Still could have been a bit tighter in, but my wife has very small hands...

As I believe Arty said, I was also concerned with the rear of the guard sticking up. Maybe it's the difference between my wife's hand and mine, but seriously this is not an issue with me. The knife is easily moved around and as trench style knife works fine. For major chopping it is not going to work as well as a standard khukuri because of this and how you can position your hand, but there is still some latitude as to how you can hold it and use it.

For stabbing, thrusting, punching and parrying it is just the thing, but obviously will do those things better than others. Not for everyone I'm sure, but still a unique well balanced piece.

Thanks,

Norm
 
Back
Top