- Joined
- Apr 6, 2014
- Messages
- 180
High road cbfurg...you took it. Stay on it.:thumbup:
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
I don't state my opinion to "crap on your parade". I just happen to be a knife lover that believes in quality reflecting cost, not politics and BS.
I mean nothing against buyers that like to buy knives based on ideas and aesthetics instead of actual function and quality. "Tactical/Military" knife buyers are living in their own genre of fantasy knives, at this point.
It is what it is.
Yeah, if I'm going to pay that kind of price, I'd prefer there be things like fit and finish and functional design involved.
This whole Medford thing is like Strider all over again. I hope, at least, that Greg Medford is exploiting legitimate military service to get sales.
Regardless, it amuses me that all you need to do is cite a service background and say "'Merica" a few times to get people to pay a mortgage payment for a poorly finished folding spatula.
There is so much incorrect BS in that post I wouldn't know where to begin.
I guess we all have opinions, but maybe when they're that pointless and baseless, maybe we should just keep it to ourselves.
Anyway, nice to see that new lows can still be reached.....
Argue with me with real counterpoints, then.
I believe that Medford is everything wrong with this industry.
At this price point, I believe that there should be a standard for fit and finish. I can look at the pics in the original post and see finish quality lower than knives that cost 30 bucks that are made in China.
I believe that a person buying knives at this price point should be an expert. Throwing down half a grand on a knife effects the market and what is acceptable to sell in that range. Knives should be made with cutting in mind. Medford knives have very poor blade geometry. That is insulting to the intelligence of knife enthusiasts. Would a gun lover pay top range prices for a gun that has poor shooting performance? This is the kind of nonsense that turns knives to pocket accessories and not tools.
I believe that a person should buy a knife based on performance and the reputation of the manufacturer, not how "tactical" the knife looks and how military it is. I hated Strider for this, and I hate Medford even more. These knives are snake oil.
The giant rant about how you have to maintenance your knife exactly how Medford says is another flag. I can take apart my Sebenza 100 times and lube it with whatever I want, and it will still go back together every time perfect with no blade play and consistent performance. That is what premium prices should get you.
If you are paying over $400 for a knife with bad blade geometry, walk-on-eggshells construction, garbage finish and no worthy reputation just because it's trendy, tactical-looking and expensive, then you will get no quarter from me. You are exactly the people that are ruining high-end knives.
Go ahead and tell me how wrong I am. I can't wait.
Don't feed the Troll and maybe it'll go back under the bridge.![]()
Thanks guys. Sorry this turned negative. I was just excited about my new knife.