- Joined
- Nov 3, 1998
- Messages
- 4,331
Real "martial arts" is SOLDIER training, not a character building, boy-scout style hobby.
I don't know if I agree, Danny. There's a lot of stuff in soldiering that really has nothing to do with your worth as a human OR meeting and defeating an enemy- just stupid little things that are militarily necessary, like drill and ceremony (which some argue the need for left with the demise of Napoleonic warfare).
I really don't find a need for marching for hours, carrying 2/3 of my body weight as a training aid in my martial training, though I've done it more 'n a few times in the Army.
I propose that building your character- making yourself a more capable, well-rounded human in every way- is indeed a major part of ritualized martial arts training. I happen to think it will increase your effectiveness as a soldier, or just about anything else.
Danny, I've known a few people I thought were really good soldiers. They fit in great with a TEAM, and they knew their jobs completely. I could have beaten almost every one, in single unarmed or manual weapon combat, but they were better soldiers than I.
I ain't so tough. I'd say about 30% of the soldiers in my infantry company were tougher than me, when you talk about the amount of hard #$%@ one could digest and keep going. At the same time, I had little doubts about the outcome if I were pitted against them in most life and death struggles.
I would win. Why? Because of my years of training that the Army could not afford- and in actuality, had no need- to give them. But, many of them were better soldiers.
Is that a little clearer?
Perhaps it would be more accurate to say real martial arts are concerned with life and death, because introducing the idea of soldiery into it is really a false concept.
John