New pistol

Thats a sweet little pistol. I really want to get a micro framed 1911. I just can't decide between 9 and 45.
 
I have a Para 1911 that I love. I should put up a pic, but I am too lazy to go get it.

My carry gun is a Kahr PM9
 
I'm a 45 fan from way back but if I buy one of these new compact models I will probably go 9mm just for the hell of it.

I need another pistol like I need another hole in my head.
 
Just got an email from someone who I really trust when it comes to pistols and they said steer clear of this compact pistol.
 
Jeff,
Just get a Sig 229-DAK. Double action, every pull like a revolver. Completely reliable (Mine's NEVER had a FTF or FTE).


As a bonus: Buy the 40/357sig model, then get the Barsto 9mm barrel to fit and you have a 3 caliber pistol by simply changing the barrel.
I carry in .40S&W and shoot cheap 9mm on the range for practice.
 
I handled one, and the trigger was really light and crisp, but the total package didnt feel really quality to me if that makes sense.

The nicest compact 1911 I have ever shot was a Colt New Agent.
 
Here's what my guy said:

"The problem is that there is only a few inches of recoil spring under that three-inch barrel, and the spring loses its “oomph” after only 150-200 rounds. When that happens, you end up with the dreaded bolt over brass malfunction. In other words, the cyclic speed of the slide, caused by a small, lightweight slide and hardly no recoil spring resistance, is so fast that the slide tries close before the spring tension in the magazine can raise another cartridge high enough to load, jamming the cartridge between the breech face and the magazine lips."
 
That makes alot of sence. I wonder if a heavier spring from wolf would solve some of that. Hard to say. What I do know is I would not like to have trust issues ith a carry piece like that. I think I would just pass on one.
 
R.A.T. said:
Here's what my guy said:

"The problem is that there is only a few inches of recoil spring under that three-inch barrel, and the spring loses its “oomph” after only 150-200 rounds. When that happens, you end up with the dreaded bolt over brass malfunction. In other words, the cyclic speed of the slide, caused by a small, lightweight slide and hardly no recoil spring resistance, is so fast that the slide tries close before the spring tension in the magazine can raise another cartridge high enough to load, jamming the cartridge between the breech face and the magazine lips."
Click to expand...

A classic and VERY dreaded problem.

See -- you CAN learn something by coming to BF.

Many thanks for the warning. :thumbup:
 
The best reviewed 9mm in a 1911 style is the Springfield EMP, everyone seems to like theirs. I'd be tempted, but it is costly that is for sure. Sexy little thing though and I still want one.

http://ezine.m1911.org/SAemp.htm

Review I found real quick. I do not yet own a 1911, but I do want one and I want a compact model so I look at these size 1911s from time to time. Still looking for the right one, and the money to get it once I find it!
 
dblagent-

If this is your first 1911 go .45, and no smaller then a Commander to get the feel, and experiance with one. Just my reccomendation, Ive owned multiple 1911s in most sizes and calibers. Its a gun that IMO is the finest combat pistol ever made.
 
R.A.T. said:
Here's what my guy said:

"The problem is that there is only a few inches of recoil spring under that three-inch barrel, and the spring loses its “oomph” after only 150-200 rounds. When that happens, you end up with the dreaded bolt over brass malfunction. In other words, the cyclic speed of the slide, caused by a small, lightweight slide and hardly no recoil spring resistance, is so fast that the slide tries close before the spring tension in the magazine can raise another cartridge high enough to load, jamming the cartridge between the breech face and the magazine lips."
Click to expand...

j williams said:
That makes alot of sence. I wonder if a heavier spring from wolf would solve some of that. Hard to say. What I do know is I would not like to have trust issues ith a carry piece like that. I think I would just pass on one.
Click to expand...

I haven't heard about any feedback on them with this issue.

I've handled but haven't shot one. I didn't buy it if that is any input at all. I've instructed firearms since 1995.

The Wolf recoil spring upgrade was also one of the first things I thought of. ;):thumbup:

If I were shooting one of these, I would know within the first session because I would shoot easily into the 200+ round count for familiarization and break-in.

I'll try to do some checking but I don't doubt your source Jeff.

Carry Glock = no worries.

Kahrs are nice platforms as well.

I love full size 1911s but don't own a compact yet.
 
Jeff,
I too was looking into a mini 9mm carry gun after much debate,research
settled on a CW9 price,quality,weight and yes I also looked into Glock since
I do glock mods and stippling.But Kahr's are lighter and more compact that said
I either carry a Glock 30 or 29 or the kahr depending on mood or clothes

Bill
 
I havent heard of a lot of feedback about para, but I'm not a fan of 1911 style pistols. Tend to jam too much.

I Carry an HK USP Compact in 9mm. (I wish my beloved Sig P220 .45 would fit comfortably) Despite what the mainsteam seems to say, 9mm is a more than decent SD round. You just have to get the right load. (Cor Bon 115gr JHP +P for me)

Jeff, I recommend for you a Sig P239 in 9MM. Little smaller than the 229 as previously suggested (closer to that para). However, the 229 is awesome too.
 
j williams said:
dblagent-

If this is your first 1911 go .45, and no smaller then a Commander to get the feel, and experiance with one. Just my reccomendation, Ive owned multiple 1911s in most sizes and calibers. Its a gun that IMO is the finest combat pistol ever made.
Click to expand...

Thats what I did. I got a plane jane .45.
stainless.jpg
 
Appreciate all the responses.

I carry a Glock 27 every day from the time I put my pants on until I take them off. I also own a couple of fulls size .45s. The compact size of the Para intrigued me. Not out of necessity but out of "want." If anyone finds out about reliability first-hand then I would be interested.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top