- Joined
- May 14, 2008
- Messages
- 6
I just got a Ti Lum. It does not seem as well constructed as my other Lums!
This one has the liner bent to form the lock. This causes an extra gap along the lock side of the liner.
Also, the handle slabs are different thicknesses. This ruins the symmetry and allows the skinny slab to flex. My other Lums do not flex!
Finally the gap between the blade and the slab at the pivot end is huge. It looks a little sloppy. I think the spacers force the gaps to be asymmetrical, too.
This may be my last Spyderco Lum. I want the carbon fiber version, but, not if it is this "new" design...
This one has the liner bent to form the lock. This causes an extra gap along the lock side of the liner.
Also, the handle slabs are different thicknesses. This ruins the symmetry and allows the skinny slab to flex. My other Lums do not flex!
Finally the gap between the blade and the slab at the pivot end is huge. It looks a little sloppy. I think the spacers force the gaps to be asymmetrical, too.
This may be my last Spyderco Lum. I want the carbon fiber version, but, not if it is this "new" design...