Parker; your question regarding a composite pistol is an interesting one. I can see several problems immediately:
First, you are going to have a very low mass slide; therefore, you will need a very strong recoil spring. This must be made of metal, and the RS for a 1911 is about 3/8 oz., with a firing pin spring included. You will need more springs, however. I don't see how you are going feed ammo without a magazine spring, also a trigger spring is necessary, and there has to be someway of putting tension on the extractor, so there is another spring.
If you want the hammer to go forward, then yet another spring is required. In short, a pistol requires a lot of metal mass in the springs contained therein.
Second, I don't think there is any composite available today which will handle the pressure of a metallic cartridge. Thus, I think your project doomed to failure if you must use a steel bbl., but see only one way to avoid using a metal bbl. This would be by use of a ceramic or composite bbl. with a thin Ti liner. Since Ti is very poor at generating eddy currents, it may be of insufficient quantity to set off a metal detector.
Third, the ammo. Caseless rounds sound great, but consider that you must have a primer in each round, and this is more metal. Further, caseless rounds depend on the firearm for gas sealing (since there is no brass cartridge case to do the job), and this requires a heavier construction than in a firearm utilizing conventional ammunition. I think that designing a composite pistol which could seal the gas on a caseless round would be a difficult task indeed.
Fourth, what about the projectile? If you use something non metallic, such as a ceramic, it wouldn't set off a metal detector, but I doubt that the projectile would have good terminal ballistics. Ceramic will not expand, although it may fragment (which is NOT good for a defensive round); further, it is very light compared with lead, so the kinetic energy in a ceramic bullet would much less than a lead bullet. Of course, you could increase operating pressure and gain high velocity, but I doubt that a pistol such as the one we have outlined would stand the high operating pressure, and even if high velocity could be obtained, the ceramic bullet, being lighter than a lead bullet, would shed velocity much more rapidly.
For these reasons, I believe the project to be not feasible at this time. As far as I can determine as a civilian. In reality, I wouldn't be surprised if some government agency is busily working on just this project, and will have a working pistol within a few years, if it does not already exist.
Questions, comments, criticisms as always, are welcome. (formerly Whacko) Walt