O1 vs 5160

Hengelo_77

Basic Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
6,224
If you make medium to larger blades will there be much difference if o1 steel or 5160 steel is used?
(Assuming the blades are made correctly)
 
Much depends on the intended use. 5160 is more shock resistant, 01 holds a much better edge.
 
Your better off using a tool steel designed for shock applications than 5160. Say, S5, which is superiour to S7 in toughness and hardness.
 
In my opinion the difference is so small you won't be able to tell them apart just by regular usage.
 
L6 is a tool steel (tool steel/higher quality manufacture) that is extremely tough and forgeable. I use it instead of 5160... is both tougher and has higher carbon.

Some have said 7" and shorter, and for cutting use, is where O1 fits extremely well.

Mike
 
Like Ray, Having forged knives out of each, you will be hard pressed to notice a diffrence in either blade steel. I can't sing enough praise for either steel choice. S5 or S7 are great steels, but extremely cost prohibitive. You'll be able to make 2-3 knives out of 5160 for the price of one O1 knife. so it is by far the more economical choice. Besides as long as you have a dead nuts heat treat both O1 and 5160 will perform flawlessly. Infact I believe more JS and MS test knives are made from 5160 than any other. and that is a test and a half for a blade!

Jason
 
L6 is a tool steel (tool steel/higher quality manufacture) that is extremely tough and forgeable. I use it instead of 5160... is both tougher and has higher carbon.

Unless my materials database is plain wrong which is unlikely, the mechanical properties data I have shows that L6 is indeed not tougher than 5160.
 
Like Ray, Having forged knives out of each, you will be hard pressed to notice a diffrence in either blade steel. I can't sing enough praise for either steel choice. S5 or S7 are great steels, but extremely cost prohibitive. You'll be able to make 2-3 knives out of 5160 for the price of one O1 knife. so it is by far the more economical choice. Besides as long as you have a dead nuts heat treat both O1 and 5160 will perform flawlessly. Infact I believe more JS and MS test knives are made from 5160 than any other. and that is a test and a half for a blade!

Jason hit it right on the head, a well know ABS Mastersmith also professes the fact that a majority of people performing the first process in the test use 5160, if you forge your knives that steel is very pleniful, as in most coil springs and most of the OLDER leaf sring. If you plan on really hard use, you'd do well using 5160. I think.
 
Just my opinion, but those who say that you cannot tell the difference between 5160, and 01 in usage, have not used 01 that was properly HTed. The ABS testing is for the makers skill, and not for blade quality!
 
Unless my materials database is plain wrong which is unlikely, the mechanical properties data I have shows that L6 is indeed not tougher than 5160.

I don't have a materials database and wouldn't be able to read one if I did. My belief is primarily based in discussion from knife makers who I feel know metallurgy very well. I've never seen an industry chart with both L6 and 5160 on it. The charts I've seen showing relative wear, toughness, etc. have L6 as high toughness when compared to other, readily forgeable tool steels.

Mike
 
Mike its not hard mate. There is standardized tests for measuring toughness. All you need to do is compare the figures for different materials and make sure the tests are actually the same. i.e. not testing toughness of one hardened to only 45HRC vs the other one hardened to HRC60.

Theres some online free databases but sometimes they dont have all the data for all the tests.

Anyway, I double checked it against a second source and I can assure you 5160 has more toughness than L6. Its a fact.
 
My materials database says about L6: "Knives for work requiring high toughness: L6"

That database would be the ASM International handbook volume 1: Properties and Selection: Irons, Steels and High Performance Alloys.
I can assure you 5160 has more toughness than L6. Its a fact.

Everybody knows that 5160 is tough, that's why they make leaf springs out of it. Could you be more specific (less generalized statements) regarding your 'sources' and provide links or quotes?
 
Last edited:
Anyway, I double checked it against a second source and I can assure you 5160 has more toughness than L6. Its a fact.

This is the first time I've ever heard this. In all the metallurgically inclined discussions on toughness that have been had on these forums, L6 is considered tougher than 5160. I would be very interested in seeing your sources. If they're not online, could you scan the relevant pages to share?
 
We recently did a test of O1 and a 5160 type of steel ( the same without the chromium) and found out O1 is perfectly useable for larger blades.

http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=662280

So they are both very good for larger blades

We chopped about 6 to 8 2"x 4"s with both knives and there was no sign of one steel being better then the other so we decided to bend them. Again no real difference......

Hope this helps.

Erik
 
I think you need to put some figures behind the 5160 and L6 claims. What toughness at what hardness for each steel?

The comment about S5 and S7 leads me to believe that too much time is being spent looking at charts and not enough time working with knife steels. Knifemakers are very quick to jump onto new steels with "superior" properties - this anecdotal evidence tells me that there may be a reason that you don't see either of these steels in widespread use in the custom knife world.

What blanket scenario is S5 always going to be better than 5160 if you need a "tough" blade? What if you'd like a knife that reached some sort of balance between the many different properties that a blade steel can possess?
 
5160 can handle more abuse if the exact same knife design, geometry and hardness were used.

O1 will slice for longer.
 
The comment about S5 and S7 leads me to believe that too much time is being spent looking at charts and not enough time working with knife steels. Knifemakers are very quick to jump onto new steels with "superior" properties - this anecdotal evidence tells me that there may be a reason that you don't see either of these steels in widespread use in the custom knife world.

Its false logic to say that because a certain material is not in common use for cutlery knives its not better than what is commonly used.

Its not anecdotal evidence either. The mechanical properties of S5 are superiour to S7 for my needs in that you can achieve higher HRC values while at the same time exhibiting greater toughness in the charpy tests at these higher HRC values. All of these mechanical properties can and have been measured for decades.

I'll see if theres anything online at matweb.com or elsewhere for some online sources you all can see.
 
Higher HRC does not necessarily make a better knife, regardless of toughness. S7 has been around for quite a long time. It HAS been used in knives, most people just don't go back to it. That is anecdotal evidence. Charpy tests alone do not prove that a steel will make a better knife, no matter the HRC.

Consider some of the other Crucible steels that are being used for knives, like S30V, S90V, CPM 3V etc. Why did these catch on and not your beloved S5 and S7 steels? S5 may well be the perfect steel for your specific application - but when someone asks a general question about two specific oil quenching carbon steels, answering with a simple "use S5 for 'shock applications'" if pretty well useless.

Crucible does not list S5 or S7 as a high speed steel for cutting tools, it does not list them as stainless tool steels... S7 and S5 are listed as a die, mold and tool steels for metal forming and plastics. These are designed for a very different sort of impact than the edge of a "tough" knife.

Here is some info for you from Crucible's orange book -

Crucible Tool Steel and Specialty Alloy Selector Pg. 77-78 said:
S5

Typical Applications
Heading Tools
Punches
Chisels
Shear Blades
Rivet Sets
Concrete Breakers
Hand Tools
Hammers

Typical Properties
300F 60-61RC 49 Ft-Lbs.
400F 58-60RC 138 Ft-Lbs.
500F 58-59RC 146 Ft-Lbs.
600F 57-58RC 142 Ft-Lbs.
700F 56-57RC 156 Ft-Lbs.

Crucible Tool Steel and Specialty Alloy Selector Pg. 80-81 said:
S7

Typical Applictions
Punches and Dies Subject to Heavy Impact
Wire EDMed Punches & Dies
Warm Forgin/Heading Dies
Plastic Inject Molds
Shear Blades

Typical Properties
300F 59RC 85Ft-Lbs.
400F 57RC 125Ft-Lbs.
500F 55RC 125Ft-Lbs.
600F 54RC 115Ft-Lbs.
-
1100F 47RC 190Ft-Lbs.

You'll note that the only blade application in both of these steels is shear blades. Now that I've gone and posted these awing toughness numbers - tell me, how do they make a knife better if it's not being used solely to bludgeon through things?

You'll note that even with these great facts and figures about HRC and Charpy values we know nothing of abrasion resistance, something of particular interest to folks whose products primary use revolves around, you guessed it, abrasion.

Some listed applications for other steels that Crucible sells (sold?) that are common for knife blades:
Crucible Tool Steel and Specialty Alloy Selector Pg. 50 said:
Trim Dies
Wear Inserts
Blanking Dies and Punches
Engraving Tools
Paper Knives
Taps
Industrial Knives ad Slitters
Scrap Choppers
Broaches
Shaper Cutters
Shaving Cutters
Milling Cutters
Threading Dies
Industrial Knives, Slitters, and Cutters
Long-wearing Specialty Cutlery
Wear Components for Food and Chemical Processing
Knives
Surgical Tools
Cutlery

Looks a little different yes? Interesting bit of info - the description on S7 says it offers "good wear resistance", S5 has no such description. It may be a stretch, but one might assume that since these steels are not only in the same family, but also listed consecutively in the Crucible book that S5 has less wear resistance than S7. If we extrapolate this further, we can look at the datasheet for CPM 3V and see a chart that shows 3V, A2, D2 and CPM M4 all having significantly higher wear resistance values and a far less significant difference in toughness between CPM 3V and S7.

3V data sheet @ Crucible
http://www.crucibleservice.com/datash/ds3Vv5b.pdf

OK, now that we've seen that not only can I read the same data sheets you can, but I also own them, can we get on to the part where you show us properties in S5 that are desirable in a knife?

One can spend too much time looking at numbers on the internet or a book and not enough time trying to make them do something for him. Have you made knives with any of the steels that I've listed? What application were/are they used in? How did they compare to other steels in this discussion? Or, was this all just done up on paper and never actually tested?
 
Seems like they might have listed S5 if it was an appropriate steel for the application...
Or maybe champalloy (L6), guess it doesn't make good knives either. Nor does 52100, W2, O1, CPM M4, S7, and so on. None of those are in that pdf.
 
Back
Top