- Joined
- Jun 13, 2007
- Messages
- 7,743
By 'shaping carbides', I'm referring to grinding them aggressively enough to reduce their size (therefore thickness/shape) at the apex. Using very coarse diamond or other coarse abrasive might just tend to rip the (whole) carbides out of the steel matrix at the edge during sharpening, but using finer but equally-hard abrasives is what will refine them by grinding or thinning them in-place, instead of just ripping them out.
Diamond from coarse thru fine/ef/eef will do it faster (especially during the heavy grinding/re-bevelling). Silicon carbide will still do it, albeit not as fast; and aluminum oxide abrasives slower still. Sometimes, for me, the slower-cutting rate of SiC or AlOx can be advantageous in the super-fine-tuning of an edge, in that it goes about it very, very gradually (think of Spyderco's ceramics). This is a good thing when the edge becomes finer and finer, when you want to avoid tearing out the carbides (which effectively blunts the edge), and instead sharpening and refining them in-place.
I suspect the idea that D2 'is better with a coarse/toothy edge' probably just comes from the fact that a coarse edge doesn't take near as long to create, and the toothiness of it makes it an effective working edge (which D2 will hold for a long time). Thing is, D2 will also take a very fine, polished edge that lasts a long time, but it takes quite a bit longer (maybe 2X/3X or longer) to make it so in the first place. And the thinness & crispness of the apex itself (therefore the finished size of carbides at the edge) become the bigger factor in sharpness & cutting ability, rather than the presence of the aggressive teeth at the edge.
David
That's what I got from your first post.

Interesting theory on the toothy edge idealism. You're REALLY making me want to grab a knife (any knife) in d2 and experiment. Seriously.
