- Joined
- Oct 24, 2005
- Messages
- 2,823
Twindog,
I'm quite a ways from being a lawyer, so your reasoning falls short with me. When the designer of the knife feels the knife is worthy of the name, that's good enough with me. I doubt the Manix2 is really in need of the jimping as the handle is so close to the Mini Manix, but Eric felt it would be an improvement for users over the original. I applaud Spyderco for making a knife that falls into a broader price-range by replacing the premium steel with a very good working steel, while still offering a stronger package, overall.
While I appreciate your(and others) loyalty to the orignal Manix(I'd love to see the all steel Rookie still in production), sales in general must've been lacking, or the Manix wouldn't be a thing of the past. And if Spyderco didn't move forward, trying to improve designs, we'd likely still be carrying knives that ressemble Buck 110s.
Out of curiousity, do you own a Manix2 yet?
I'm quite a ways from being a lawyer, so your reasoning falls short with me. When the designer of the knife feels the knife is worthy of the name, that's good enough with me. I doubt the Manix2 is really in need of the jimping as the handle is so close to the Mini Manix, but Eric felt it would be an improvement for users over the original. I applaud Spyderco for making a knife that falls into a broader price-range by replacing the premium steel with a very good working steel, while still offering a stronger package, overall.
While I appreciate your(and others) loyalty to the orignal Manix(I'd love to see the all steel Rookie still in production), sales in general must've been lacking, or the Manix wouldn't be a thing of the past. And if Spyderco didn't move forward, trying to improve designs, we'd likely still be carrying knives that ressemble Buck 110s.
Out of curiousity, do you own a Manix2 yet?