galvanic1882
Platinum Member
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2007
- Messages
- 1,226
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
Thanks very much Augie for the insight and taking the time to respondSorry for not responding sooner, your Barlow is a design unique to Queen and the Pat Number references the patent that Queen obtained for the unique construction. There was a period of time 1961 to 1971 I believe where Queen did not use a tang stamp and would just etch the model Number on the blade so your knife probably dates from that era, I also recall and I may be wrong that Queen only put the patent number on the earlier ones.
Here is a good thread that Modoc Ed did on this knife and patent including the drawings of how the knife is constructed, they are a very unusual Barlow. Despite the aluminum construction I don't think I've ever handled one that was loose, they sure are light in the pocket.
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/queen-steel-22-barlow-just-arrived.804459/
That is in great shape for its age, well done!I got this old Barlow in pretty good shape for being ancient. Was only $5 with 4 other grinder man and Pakistan specials.View attachment 809901
Not with certainty, but I am sure someone will.Thank you, do we know what that age actually is by chance?
Thanks you Charlie. I was just curious because I've always wanted but never been able to lock down a GEC #85. I think I did even better getting this old guy.Nice Queens, Duncan!! They are indeed amazingly light for their generous size!!
I got this old Barlow in pretty good shape for being ancient. Was only $5 with 4 other grinder man and Pakistan specials.View attachment 809901
More photos are called for, and like Augie states Charlie has a lot more experience than most with these. Certainly worth more than the $5 spent if it is the real thing!As Bartleby stated that appears to be the mark of Samuel Barlow, that mark with Barlow under it is thought to date from 1798 to 1830 however I did find one reference that stated family members may have used the mark as late as 1880.
North Shore, I think you may have found a pretty rare Barlow there. As Bartleby stated that appears to be the mark of Samuel Barlow, that mark with Barlow under it is thought to date from 1798 to 1830 however I did find one reference that stated family members may have used the mark as late as 1880.
For its age it does appear to be in pretty good condition, would like to see more pictures from all angles, pretty sure Charlie would like to see them also.
Congratulations on a great find.