Old Wakizashi

Stacy E. Apelt - Bladesmith

ilmarinen - MODERATOR
Moderator
Knifemaker / Craftsman / Service Provider
Joined
Aug 20, 2004
Messages
37,974
At the Harrisonburg show, I did a trade for a large batch of Ron Frazier's unfinished stuff.
My friend, Don, arranged the trade, which included several of Frazier's damascus blades that were un-handled, two swords, ivory blocks, a big Randall Bowie, and several other knives. All were being finished or re-worked when Ron fell ill several years ago.
Ron Frazier was a fantastic maker who was first a sculptor and carver, then a knife maker. He was well known for his elaborate handles with small animals on them. Ron is old and very ill ,and sadly, will pass on soon. He has not done any work in a long time.

Among the box full of things I got was a Japanese sword he had started to restore. My friend said he liked it, but had no idea how to fix it. I told him that I would restore it and give it to him. It at first glance looked un-promising, and of little value. It was a wakizashi, clearly quite old, with the blade in fair to poor polish and the saya being somewhat unusual. It was mu-mei, and the nakago had been shortened at some past time. It had been re-handled several times,too ( multiple ana). Ron had started to build fittings of an unusual nature, which I thought I might replace or modify.

After some togi, I discovered that the blade was probably from a very old sword that had been shortened into a wakizashi by shortening from the nakago. The yasurimei was quite nice, and the rust and patina had been preserved well. Off course, I left the nakago as it was. The blade , after some clean up, showed a very nice hamon, and the appropriate amount of age marks. I took it to a cleaned polish, but did not totally restore the surface, as there was no way to know how much skin was left on the blade.

My assessment was that the blade was probably about 400 years old. I can't say exactly why I came up with this age, but the feeling is that it is quite old and has many stories to tell. I wish the mei was still there, as it would have made the value soar, as well as told the age.

The tsuka was plain same' with a red lacquer coating that had been sanded down to produce a red/white handle. The tsuka was of a different wood than the saya, but both appeared to be very old. Ron had shortened the tsuka, and had re-shaped the blade end ( of the tsuka) to accomodate the fittings he had started. The saya was some sort of wood with a very weathered grain that looked like barn wood, with high and low places following the grain. It appeared to be black lacquer with red lacquer over it, and then sanded down to make a two-tone stripe caused by the topographical surface.
There were no original koshirae, and Ron was making fancy fittings in shibuichi, all done in the form of oak and sassafras leaves. He had nearly finished a kashira that had a lizard on it, and a kojiri that was leaves wrapped around the end of the saya.
He had barely started a fuchi and koiguchi that mated in such a way that the leaves flowed from one to the other. He was making it as one piece, with the intention of cutting it in half after the engraving was done to make the two parts. I decided to honor his artistic work and finish the parts he had started. I continued to add leaves to fill the areas that he still had uncovered, engraved all the parts, and then separated the fuchi/koiguchi and added end plates to make the two caps. After cutting the blade and habaki slots, I patinaed all parts. They came out silvery-black, which I rubbed down into an antiqued copper and black finish.

The saya was almost in two pieces ,as most of the rice glue had long ago come apart. Upon disassembly, I discovered that the wood was some type of black and brown species similar to black palm. The raised black grain areas were hard and the soft brown areas was abraded down to make the high/low contrast. The red lacquer thus filled the low areas and sealed the brown wood, exposing the shiny and hard black grain. I left it as it was, and fitted the koshirae to it.

The final result is a really unusual sword.I feel the value is between $2000 and $4000.

I'll post on the other sword as I get more done on it. It may be the big winner from the box.
 

Attachments

  • Fraizer Wakizashi 009.jpg
    Fraizer Wakizashi 009.jpg
    43.5 KB · Views: 100
  • Fraizer Wakizashi 017.jpg
    Fraizer Wakizashi 017.jpg
    24.5 KB · Views: 83
  • Fraizer Wakizashi 018.jpg
    Fraizer Wakizashi 018.jpg
    27.4 KB · Views: 71
  • Fraizer Wakizashi 022.jpg
    Fraizer Wakizashi 022.jpg
    61.5 KB · Views: 77
  • Fraizer Wakizashi 029.jpg
    Fraizer Wakizashi 029.jpg
    36.1 KB · Views: 61
Last edited:
More photos:
 

Attachments

  • Fraizer Wakizashi 031.jpg
    Fraizer Wakizashi 031.jpg
    41 KB · Views: 37
  • Fraizer Wakizashi 038.jpg
    Fraizer Wakizashi 038.jpg
    26.7 KB · Views: 119
I am an fairly good togishi. If proper to do so, I could have restored the blade to a museum polish.

I decided to leave the blade inwhat I call "clean polish". Ron had already started to clean it up, but had not done any damage. Basically,after a good cleaning, I skipped the shitaji, and went to shiagi. I did just enough shiagi to make the ji clear and the hamon crisp. I removed the surface rust and dirt, and took the blade to a bright surface. The blade has almost no niku, and has been re-worked at least once in the past, so this was the safest road to travel down. It makes the blade retain its "oldness" but shows its features well. Making it look like a "new" blade would be just plain wrong. The blade is probably best left this way. The togi left a good edge that will please those who feel they must "see if it is sharp" with their finger (this really annoys me). The blade will be in a collection, and not see abuse or excessive handling. I believe the new owner will appreciate it more this way.
 
I'll give the benefit of the doubt to you about the intent of your questions. One of the reasons I don't post often on this sub forum is things like this. My post was to share a nice sword with the others here, not to debate my qualifications.

FWIW, I didn't apprentice under anyone to learn togi.
I am also a well known jeweler, and a prize winning woodcarver....I didn't apprentice under anyone for those fields either. The Queen ( of the UK) has one of my silverwork pieces.

I'll move back to Shop Talk.
 
Any good shots of the blade? I'm curious about it now, after your description. Thanks for sharing!
 
Sorry, haven't been back to this sub-forum lately.

The sword is with its new owner. I may take some more shots of the blade when I'm over there one day.

I'll post some shots of the other blades I am going to be finishing later this summer.
 
yea it all depends if you are looking for the vintage look

(( irrelevant spam ))
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'll give the benefit of the doubt to you about the intent of your questions. One of the reasons I don't post often on this sub forum is things like this. My post was to share a nice sword with the others here, not to debate my qualifications.

FWIW, I didn't apprentice under anyone to learn togi.
I am also a well known jeweler, and a prize winning woodcarver....I didn't apprentice under anyone for those fields either. The Queen ( of the UK) has one of my silverwork pieces.

I'll move back to Shop Talk.

And just because a guy was in the army, doesn't mean he was in the special forces either .

I'm sure you'r very skilled in your areas of expertice, lately the word "togi/togoshi" have been thrown around on a number of forums.

I've asked the NBTHK American branch for some guidence as to who can claim to be a togi.
 
I very much respect the NBTHK, but them saying who could be called a togishi would be like saying, "Only the ABS can allow you to call yourself a bladesmith".
If you forge blades...you are a bladesmith. Blade = the major part of a knife......smith = one who forges or shapes....bladesmith = one who forges/shapes knife blades.
If you do togi....you are a togishi. togi = polishing.........'shi = one who does........togishi = one who does polishing.

I do agree that both organizations have the right to grant their backing to those who have been certified by them, but beyond that neither one claims any universal control over their genre.

I'm not sure who governs togoshi??????
 
I very much respect the NBTHK, but them saying who could be called a togishi would be like saying, "Only the ABS can allow you to call yourself a bladesmith".
If you forge blades...you are a bladesmith. Blade = the major part of a knife......smith = one who forges or shapes....bladesmith = one who forges/shapes knife blades.
If you do togi....you are a togishi. togi = polishing.........'shi = one who does........togishi = one who does polishing.

I do agree that both organizations have the right to grant their backing to those who have been certified by them, but beyond that neither one claims any universal control over their genre.

I'm not sure who governs togoshi??????

Agreed. It's nice if you have accreditation by such an organization, but it's not necessary to bear the title.
 
I very much respect the NBTHK, but them saying who could be called a togishi would be like saying, "Only the ABS can allow you to call yourself a bladesmith".
If you forge blades...you are a bladesmith. Blade = the major part of a knife......smith = one who forges or shapes....bladesmith = one who forges/shapes knife blades.
If you do togi....you are a togishi. togi = polishing.........'shi = one who does........togishi = one who does polishing.

I do agree that both organizations have the right to grant their backing to those who have been certified by them, but beyond that neither one claims any universal control over their genre.

I'm not sure who governs togoshi??????

actually, they do. http://www.nbthk-ab.org/Japan.htm


since they are the final say on idetification and papering of nihonto, they can decide who is qualified to polish.
They only acknowledge togi of have apprenticed under an acknowledged togi. Here in the states there are only a few that qualify.
That being said, it would be interesting to find out their opinion on a nihonto that was not polished by a recognized polisher. Would it be seen as ruined?
I will ask.
 
Last edited:
Stacy....you may know quite a bit about polishing nihonto....I'm not going to question that......I'll simply quote a very good polisher I know, Keith Larman of Summer Child Polishing:

""Togi" is the Japanese word for polishing Japanese swords. We often use the word polishing, but it really isn't a very good translation of the word "togi". Japanese swords are very precise, elegant, and complex blades. The best swords have an incredible symmetry and beauty. The "polisher's" job is not just to bring out activities in the blade or to remove scratches. Those things are more by-products of a good polish. A good polish brings out the shape the smith intended, cleaning up the lines, shifting things subtly into position, moving lines, changing surfaces, and basically bringing out the beauty of the smith's vision. This is why a good polish is expensive -- there simply is no fast way to accomplish this. There are polishers who only work to bring out activities and get the edge sharp. That's fine if that's all you want. But to me that's like spraying a new paint job on a car that has dents and is missing body parts. The surface as exposed may have a lovely sheen, but the car is still in need of repair. To the untrained eye it may look okay, but to the experienced eye the blade will look terrible.

I do not currently offer any services for repolishing existing Japanese blades. This is by choice. I feel that proper restoration, especially of antique blades, requires a background in not only proper technique, but also the full history of the Japanese Sword. I do not feel I know enough of the history to feel comfortable working on an antique of value. Frankly, there really aren't many people out there to whom one should even consider sending their antique sword."

Granted this is one person's opinion, but that person has been almost solely dedicated to polishing Japanese style blades since before I started studying JSA, so let's say 12+ years....words worth considering, imo.

Best Regards,

STeven Garsson
 
Also all very good information and very true. I still feel that you don't require accreditation to bear the title of togishi though--just to be recognized as a good one! I strongly suspect that back in the day there were plenty of folks who polished swords but weren't especially good at it. :D
 
I certainly understand why the NBTHK set up their rules and became the controlling authority in Japan. However, they do not state that a non-authorized person can't polish a sword.....just that they only recognize those who have submitted their credentials to them.

In the beginning of their organization, they were concerned about the old swords disappearing. They didn't want people to ruin a sword with sandpaper and files. I get that, too.

However, consider that any togishi practicing during the roughly 1000 years before the NBTHK formed was not an "authorized" polished. That doesn't seem to make the ancient blades worthless.

As far as modern times go, if you want papers, you have to jump through their hoops. If you don't want their opinion, or the blade can not have papers, then the sword can be polished and fitted as you wish and by whom you wish.

It would be a shame to ruin a 400 year old sword, and I did what I thought was the best course of conservatorship.
If the NBTHK, or one of its adherents, doesn't like what I did, that is their right...but it is my sword. I consider it in good condition now, and bad condition before I worked on it. The new owner is also quite happy with it.

Again, with all respect for what they have done to prosper and preserve the sword, knives, and dog breeding:

The NBTHK does not decide if it is a good sword or you are a good polisher....unless you ask them to.
The ABS does not decide if it is a good knife or you are a good maker.....unless you ask them to.
The AKC does not decide if your dog is pretty or if you are feeding him right.....unless you ask them to.

All these organizations set standards for their followers to adhere to. And all of these offer accreditation for things submitted to them. But those outside of their realm are not subject to their rule ( excepting Japan, where the NBTHK has strict control).



Are you sure the NBTHK governs togoshi? ...........I thought that was a district in Tokyo?
 
Stacy....you may know quite a bit about polishing nihonto....I'm not going to question that......I'll simply quote a very good polisher I know, Keith Larman of Summer Child Polishing:

""Togi" is the Japanese word for polishing Japanese swords. We often use the word polishing, but it really isn't a very good translation of the word "togi". Japanese swords are very precise, elegant, and complex blades. The best swords have an incredible symmetry and beauty. The "polisher's" job is not just to bring out activities in the blade or to remove scratches. Those things are more by-products of a good polish. A good polish brings out the shape the smith intended, cleaning up the lines, shifting things subtly into position, moving lines, changing surfaces, and basically bringing out the beauty of the smith's vision. This is why a good polish is expensive -- there simply is no fast way to accomplish this. There are polishers who only work to bring out activities and get the edge sharp. That's fine if that's all you want. But to me that's like spraying a new paint job on a car that has dents and is missing body parts. The surface as exposed may have a lovely sheen, but the car is still in need of repair. To the untrained eye it may look okay, but to the experienced eye the blade will look terrible.

I do not currently offer any services for repolishing existing Japanese blades. This is by choice. I feel that proper restoration, especially of antique blades, requires a background in not only proper technique, but also the full history of the Japanese Sword. I do not feel I know enough of the history to feel comfortable working on an antique of value. Frankly, there really aren't many people out there to whom one should even consider sending their antique sword."

Granted this is one person's opinion, but that person has been almost solely dedicated to polishing Japanese style blades since before I started studying JSA, so let's say 12+ years....words worth considering, imo.

Best Regards,

STeven Garsson

As usual Keith lays it out pretty well.
 
Back
Top