Carl,
as you surely remember, one (or even two) of my first threads here was about the same topic, just the other way round.
I'm discovering the other side of the moon, or at least what was for me the other side of the moon...for many among you, I was on the other side...I don't have a definitive answer for that. Yet.
As you know, and like many others, I grew up with single bladed knives and never felt the need of more. I decided to try multibladed knives due to this subforum, and due to my endless curiosity and will to discover new things, even though it seemed a huge overkill to have two, three or even four blades.
As a pure "theoretical" fact, I admit that having two blades (one for "clean" cuts and the other for "dirty" tasks) makes some sense. Third blade is just added weight to me. As others have posted before, on my Buck 303 it seems that the spey blade is there only to get in the way, and I do understand 300Bucks' wish to customize a 303. If you ever start that factory order at Buck, put me in for one or two, ok?

In practical terms, I still carry single bladed knives and never feel underbladed.
In the end, as for many things, it's always a matter of what you like most. Needs and use are way less important that what we sometimes pretend it to be.
As a last sidenote, no matter what I own and carry and use, there's one point where I know that single bladed knives will always win for me. Looks. The "simple purity" of a single bladed knife can't be beat in terms of aesthetics.
But, as for every word in this post, it's just a very personal opinion

Anyway, I'm curious to see how you go on this road Carl
Fausto
