Another thing I have been wondering about and unable to find an answer to in the archives...
In comparing methods for a soft backed blade, I see several processes that should result in 2 end results. Correct me if I an wrong, but:
First, the edge and clay quench methods would result in a hardened edge with a spine primarily of ferrite.
Second, the fully hardened blade with a torch tempered spine would result in a hardened edge with a heavily tempered martensite spine.
What is the practical difference between the two in terms of impact resistance and flexibility before permanent deformation?
The reason I ask is because I have 2 pieces of steel (1095 and 5160) waiting for my next learning experience
...both 1/4" thick and destined for camp blades. I was considering trying one of these methods at the same time.
In comparing methods for a soft backed blade, I see several processes that should result in 2 end results. Correct me if I an wrong, but:
First, the edge and clay quench methods would result in a hardened edge with a spine primarily of ferrite.
Second, the fully hardened blade with a torch tempered spine would result in a hardened edge with a heavily tempered martensite spine.
What is the practical difference between the two in terms of impact resistance and flexibility before permanent deformation?
The reason I ask is because I have 2 pieces of steel (1095 and 5160) waiting for my next learning experience