So you never really tried it, and you were unable to discern
any virtue? Sounds like you were biased or you clearly didn’t understand what you were buying.
Here’s the only lock test I could find on an opinel, and the way the guy got it to fail was by jimmying the blade position so the lock ring would rotate open. I notice that the “flimsy” lock is still in one piece. Looks to me like if that lock fails, you were doing something you shouldn’t have been doing with a peasant knife.
ETA: and in case you were wondering what "Opinel Knife Fail 1" was, this heavy mouth breather locks the opi closed and then pulls up hard on the blade until the lock pops off. It's the most pointless test I've ever seen.
It's a good thing his comments are disabled.
I have to admit that I have never understood the obsession with blade locks. I guess growing with slip joints in the pre-Buck 110 era, I learned to not tr to cut anything with the back of the blade.
As far as the Opinel locks goes, I find it funny that from 1890 to 1955, all the Opinels were a friction folder. In all the years since 1982 when I got my first Opinel, I rarely bother using the locking ring, as I am cutting with the actual edge of the knife. A novel idea, I grant you. But when I got my first knife at age 12, a genuine 'Official' Boy Scout knife, the first thing we learned was not to do anything stupid that would cause the blade to fold on your fingers. Like trying to cut with the back of the blade. If we needed a knife that we knew would absolutely not fold on us, we had it. It was called a fixed blade. A blade that didn't need any kind of lock because it was one solid piece of steel from tip to pommel.
I must have been so very lucky, that I made it through childhood with slip joint pocket knives, 10 years service in the U.S. Army Engineers with the demo knife or a SAK as my do-all pocket knife. In the early 1970's I tried a Buck 110, but it only lasted a few months before I gave it away. Just couldn't stand a half pound of brass to hold just one skinny blade. In the 40 years I've been using Opinels, I've had zero failures myself. I did witness one failure, that was a smaller number 7. It was an occasion where out on a winter hike, a friends wife slipped on some icy rock and broke her ankle. we decided to make a litter to carry her out on. I was using a Victorinox pioneer (No lock) and Danny had a number 7 Opinel. He was cutting down a sapling by notching around the base and creating a stress ring to break it off. The wood handle broke off flush where it was turned down to mount the whole business on; the blade, pivot, licking ring, and inner bolster sheered off. We finished making the stretcher using just the Victorinox pioneer.
To be fair, Danny is a 6' 4" 250 pound gym guy, with hands like a baseball glove, and he was a wee bit frantic hearing his wife groaning in pain. His number 9 Opinel has held up for him for many years, as well as his number 12 slim that he uses for filleting large fish he pulls out of the Chesapeake Bay.
I've found the Opinel is a great knife for every day use in real world suburbia. If I need something more surly, I'll use a fixed blade. That so called test video is plain dub, who puts that much pressure on the back of a blade? In my 81 years of life that includes a lot of backpacking, canoe camping, kayak camping, hiking, and fishing, I've never had to lever or push on the black or the blade. I do not understand the obsession with blade locks.