Scott, would it be fair to suggest that the larger the cross section of the part, the lower the tempering temp and the longer the time? I've been sitting here thinking about this and reading some, and it struck me that the lower temp would allow for more homogeneous temp throughout a larger piece because of the extended equilibration times between inside and outside.
Have you seen the actual tempering time versus temp curves? I bet those are intruiging and insightful.
I read that the higher the alloy content, the more this applies. In Verhoeven's guide, for simple AISI 1045, the hardnesses were (approx) within two points between 1 and 4 hours for any given temp up to 1000F. I would have loved to see 8 and 16 hour data. I would have also loved to have seen a curve for a higher alloy. If anyone has an online reference, I would appreciate seeing it. Thx.
Very interesting subject.
To keep topical: I convinced my wife this week to get some poly clay so she can make handles and we can make some desk knives for Christmas gifts. We will try some millefiore-style flowerette onlays and stuff and also some damascus-style patterning. She found that there are differences not only between brands but within each brand there are several categories with different characteristics such as strength, sag in heating, etc. Not all poly clay is created equal.