Im a Strider fan, not a Strider groupie who thinks they can do no wrong. I very much like their knives, great designs, overbuilt and fit and finish are decent on a production knife. But, there is no doubt in my mind the Sebenza is a better made knife. The Sebenza is all about precision and it also happens to be very strong as well. The Striders are less about precision, and more geared towards brute force. I like and can appreciate both approaches.
The thing is, i think the Sebenza is probably just as strong as the Striders, with the exception of tip/blade strength, i see the Strider having a blade that can withstand more abuse, but the Sebenza lock is at least as strong as any Strider's lock, and the knife to knife consistancy of quality is better on the Sebenza. The Sebenza is extremely refined with incredible attention to detail, the Striders are, well, not.
It's odd, i absolutely believe the Sebenza to be the higher quality knife, but i "like" the Striders more, the Sebenza, as amazingly well made as it is, just doesnt appeal to me visually, or on a gut/emotional level, while the Striders do. Its crazy.
I love my Sebenzas, but if i had to trade a knife away, a Sebenza or my AR, the Sebbie goes. Sad, but true. The AR is just a massive, overbuilt, brute of a knife, not as well made as a Sebenza, but more appealing to me. Oh, almost forgot, it's cool.
