- Joined
- Oct 9, 2003
- Messages
- 5,594
Actually, that article is an excellent example of what I was trying to get at. The practice in question isnt discussed in terms of actual medical science, but rather culture and identity.
It is very similar to Ghost sickness, a psychosomatic illness sometimes seen in Native Americans who feel disconnected from their ethnic roots.
It's not actually treating any actual pathology, but reaffirming that person's identity as a member of their cultural/ethnic/family group.
Easy test: Ask the person in question if they would accept the treatment from a person who learned the techniques but is clearly not a member of his or her ethnic group. (like some big white guy from Texas)
IF they say yes, then maybe it has real medical value.
IF they say no, then you know there's more to it...
The treatment has to come from someone inside the group. There tends to be some kind of physical evidence of their affirmation that they are part of the group. (bruising, cutting, even tattooing)
Now, dont get me wrong, I believe in the benefits of shock therapy. Physical pain CAN improve one's emotional outlook. (My tattoo cured me of depression)
In Japan, and probably some other Asian countries, there is this tendency to believe that biology and all other scientific facts are culturally relative, which they arent. (Maybe eating raw fish will make you sick in America, but not in Japan. Bloodtypes over here are used as horoscopes and AIDS only occurs in Americans, for example)
Please remember I'm not criticising anyone. (It might sound like it but I aint!)
It is very similar to Ghost sickness, a psychosomatic illness sometimes seen in Native Americans who feel disconnected from their ethnic roots.
It's not actually treating any actual pathology, but reaffirming that person's identity as a member of their cultural/ethnic/family group.
Easy test: Ask the person in question if they would accept the treatment from a person who learned the techniques but is clearly not a member of his or her ethnic group. (like some big white guy from Texas)
IF they say yes, then maybe it has real medical value.
IF they say no, then you know there's more to it...
The treatment has to come from someone inside the group. There tends to be some kind of physical evidence of their affirmation that they are part of the group. (bruising, cutting, even tattooing)
Now, dont get me wrong, I believe in the benefits of shock therapy. Physical pain CAN improve one's emotional outlook. (My tattoo cured me of depression)
In Japan, and probably some other Asian countries, there is this tendency to believe that biology and all other scientific facts are culturally relative, which they arent. (Maybe eating raw fish will make you sick in America, but not in Japan. Bloodtypes over here are used as horoscopes and AIDS only occurs in Americans, for example)
Please remember I'm not criticising anyone. (It might sound like it but I aint!)