- Joined
- Nov 3, 1998
- Messages
- 4,331
Well, I expect to shoot my target twice if I'm at close range, and able. I can do
this more quickly with an intermediate round than a battle rifle cartridge.
I don't really believe in magic bullets, though I do recognize that some are better designed for certain purposes than others. I'm not really impressed with .308 FMJ for anti-personnel usage, though if I'm sniping at the enemy at over 300 meters, I hopefully have some time for him to bleed out.
This changes, of course, if one is not limited to FMJ, and I see no reason to be.
For defending my house against bumps in the night, I won't reach for an FAL first, but just because it's not quite as fast and manueverable as the AR, Mossberg, or the AK I'll be getting shortly. Outside, with unknown ranges and targets, sure. I'll take the .308.
I would much prefer- given plentiful ammo- a 6.5x39mm, though. Performance on par with the .308, while being considerably lighter. You really
do get the best of both worlds, quick/light (handling) and deeper/further (round performance), which is why I
support a cartridge such as this: to replace both 5.56 and 7.62mm weapon in the US armory, greatly simplifying logistics and ultimately giving our
boys more firepower.
John
this more quickly with an intermediate round than a battle rifle cartridge.
I don't really believe in magic bullets, though I do recognize that some are better designed for certain purposes than others. I'm not really impressed with .308 FMJ for anti-personnel usage, though if I'm sniping at the enemy at over 300 meters, I hopefully have some time for him to bleed out.
This changes, of course, if one is not limited to FMJ, and I see no reason to be.
For defending my house against bumps in the night, I won't reach for an FAL first, but just because it's not quite as fast and manueverable as the AR, Mossberg, or the AK I'll be getting shortly. Outside, with unknown ranges and targets, sure. I'll take the .308.
I would much prefer- given plentiful ammo- a 6.5x39mm, though. Performance on par with the .308, while being considerably lighter. You really
do get the best of both worlds, quick/light (handling) and deeper/further (round performance), which is why I
support a cartridge such as this: to replace both 5.56 and 7.62mm weapon in the US armory, greatly simplifying logistics and ultimately giving our
boys more firepower.
John