OT: Carbine rifles?

Yes, the 30 Carbine is anemic next to a M14, but next to the Nine it looks quite good, especially at a 100 yards. We could have a thread just on the Carbine. I'm not sure what is on the standard pistol ballistic charts offered by reloading mags and companies today, but the Carbine out of a handgun used to bury the Nine, and it had the least drop at 100 yards. Military ball ammo almost insures the little carbine a pipsqueak role- inferior to modern Nine loadings and bullets. But use a soft point in the Carbine, (yeah- right- if you can get it to feed) and it'll be quite lethal. In foot pounds of energy it is much greater than the Nine or 45, but has been handicapped by small diameter and ball ammo.

Audry Murphy loved his, though.

I have a single shot 32/20 handgun that can be loaded quite hot- very much like the 30 Carbine, (though the 32/20 is three thousands or so larger diameter) and when you hit a gopher with one, he blows apart into a red mist and peices.

I had a Military Carbine once. I finally sold it to buy a Bike. They want way too much money for them today.

It was my first and last attempt to sell over the net. I went to a well known Firearms forum, and offerred all my mags, dies and brass along with the rifle for a reasonable price. A party said the rifle was his, not to worry, cancel all other offers. Then we spent two weeks of message tag...his girlfriend didn't want it...blaa blaa....He insisted I take it apart to verify serial numbers, and under the "Guruship" of his buddy in Calif, became convinced I had a Korean war arsonal import- those used by the Koreans after we left. These are not nearly as desirable. So he canceled the sale, and I was left holding the rifle without any of the earlier offers now valid- one such had already spent his money on another weapon. I was also irked that in the process of taking off the bayonet lug the Military added during WWll, it was unavoidable to not scratch the metal.

I took it to the Bozeman Gun Show, and had a mob of people around me from the moment I entered the door. I sold it for fifty less than I wanted, but still got an OK price. Guy who bought it hung a new price tag on it- a couple hundred more than I'd asked. It was a very nice US military carbine.

I know it had been arsenal refinished at some point, as the numbers were mixed, but the parkerization and metal were all excellent. The wood was superb.

I will always remember that carbine. I wonder what happened to the guy from Calif, and his guru gun buddy?

The subject of guns always brings out the race to be most correct. That's not a bad thing when we are good hearted, but can get a little snippy real fast. In many gun forums there are people who will gladly inform you without rancor, and those who want to take a chunk of your stupid, unworthy hide off for their enlightened effort, and carry it around like a flag of their superiority.

When we've been around a subject a long time, we easily fool ourselves we've seen about everything needs seeing. There was an excellent article on gun cults in the Gun Digest one year, and the writer, a fan of Jack OConner, pointed out later in life Jack believed a little too much of his own press. There was a now famous elk hunt where a .270 bullet 'bounced off' the neck of a elk. The writer knew of that hunt- he was either there or close to it, and witnessed the aftermath of the incident. The bullet apparently just failed, as bullets do from time to time. OConner, weary of the big bore crtics calling the .270 a Coyote gun (remind anyone of the poodle killing M-16?) did not believe a .270 bullet would bounce off any animal.
He hadn't seen it, he had a hard time accepting it.

During the period of time I managed a gun store and was heavily immersed in the subject, I became the 'go to' guy for questions. And like everyone flush from new knowledge, I thought I knew a few things. ( though I tried awful hard to remain decent and questioning) Throughout my life, though, I keep running into folks who know far more about guns than I. They aren't exactly common, but neither are they rare!

Anyway, in the off chance anyone has bothered reading this long and wandering post, I found HI forum to be the most decent place on the net I'd ever found. People were willing to show and teach and give you the shirt off their backs. Even in the Gun Tribe I love so much, there is not the kindness so universally shown as here. ( Though the truth of the thing is that most people who truly know a subject are humble and willing to share. )

My own gun time has come and gone, and like the old timer I hope to be, I'm about as savvy as I'll ever get, and know enough not to chomp at the bit or race to the finish. ( I hope- just don't get me started on the individual right to keep and bear arms- I cannot truck any revisionism on that) Here is this forum there are a number of gunnies, God Bless them. If you want model numbers and types, I generally look to Rusty. If you want practical experience, 45/70 is the man, and if you want one who is abrest of all that is new, and is very accurate in information besides, then Spectre is your man.

Why Khuks bring out fun, and firearm talk too often becomes elitest, I do not know.


munk
 
Interesting observations. WRT gun shops, if there are the usual "know-it-all" hangers-on sitting around the counter, I won't go in. As I may have mentioned before, when I do go into a shop for the first time, I will deliberately ask a newbie question and see what kind of response I get. If it's smart-assed, or condescending, I turn around and walk out.

I grew up in a house with over 300 firearms in it, with people constantly coming by to buy, sell or trade with my Dad, and as far as idiots, clueless newbies, camo-commandos, and pure gun nuts, I think I have seen them all at one time or another. Not an easy way to make a living, esp. in California...!

Regards,

Norm
 
The mag handgun cartridges are a whole different ball game in short carbines; they have enough case capacity to use the longer barrel and a substancial increase in velocity and power is possible. Rusty's always braggin on some some little carbine he owns....

Norm, I like your style.

There's a gunsmith outside of a Reservation nearby who is probably among the best I'll ever meet. Yet he only charges 10 or 20 bucks. He's seen the worst abuse cases over the years, and both old weapons and new. It is he who repaired most of the damage a reputable smith did to my 32/20 falling block handgun. The former smith took a diamond hone and wiped the sear off the bearing surface, reassembled the firearm incorrectly, and when the hammer would not longer stay cocked, handed it back to me and told me to return to the manufacturer as it was an unsafe gun.

The sear was so fine, the trigger pull so light, that the Smith missed it entirely and wiped it out. My friend had to make a tool small enough to cut a new track.

My Dad taught me to shoot with a BB gun, though I did not grow up with weapons. Still, the lessons I learned from him are good to this day.


munk
 
I apoligize to munk and any other M-1 Carbine owners in this forum for my opinionated comments on the previous page. I only repeated a comment made by an actual combat veteran, Donald Burgett, in his book "Seven Roads to Hell" (A Screaming Eagle at Bastogne). I collect veterans personal first-hand accounts and consider them very valuable. There is much insight also in those of the enemy, as we are seen through their eyes.

My opinions, likes & dislikes are irrelevant- I made a joke about knowing everything. Nobody knows all there is to know on any subject.

Many historians and firearms writers are in general agreement about the effacy of the .30 cal carbine round. Possibly the only definite authority is someone who's been shot with one!

20 years ago, when I needed a carbine-style firearm, I carefully considered the then-readily availble M-1 carbine (and it's easily found clips & parts) against the Ruger Mini-14. Bought the latter and had no regrets.

I don't like know-it-alls, and I revere people of genuine knowledge & experience. I learn from them and am grateful for what they pass on.

If my previous post made ME sound like one of the former above, I can only hope it's my own poor literary skills, which are under construction.


Ad Astra
 
Webster's Dictionary

Main Entry: car·bine
Pronunciation: 'kär-"bEn, -"bIn
Function: noun
Etymology: French carabine, from Middle French carabin carabineer
1 : a short-barreled lightweight firearm orig. used by cavalry
2 : a light short-barreled repeating rifle that is used as a supplementary military arm or for hunting in dense brush
 
Ad, no need for apologies- the little carbine with ball ammo is pathetic. I mean, I wouldn't want to get hit by one, but it is hardly a 'stopper'.
For us Civies, a soft point would change all that.

I've heard it argued that the ball ammo is good for shooting through car bodies, which has law enforcement utility.

And who could forget how great the little carbine looks in the Paratrooper stocks?!!


munk
 
It means different things to civilian or military. It will also vary from country to country and even seems to be constantly evolving. The british cavarly/dragoons used a carbine in the 18th 19th century that was shorter in overall length, but also fired a different caliber of projectile. I beleive the term 'carbine bore' designated a military arm that was quite a bit smaller. For some reason I think it was .62 caliber. The Brown Bess musket was a full .75 caliber.
 
I've always wanted a little marlin in .357/.38 special. The Winchester trappers are nice too, but I like the action on the Marlin a bit better. One of these days.

I read that the M1 carbine was indeed a replacement for the 1911 for military non-shooter types. So +1 to whoever said that.
 
philthygeezer said:
I've always wanted a little marlin in .357/.38 special. The Winchester trappers are nice too, but I like the action on the Marlin a bit better. One of these days.
I have one of the .357/.38 and love it. I bought a .357 Ruger Security Six when I was in Oregon and understood the cartridge was going to be legal for elk so that set off the desire for the carbine.
For a long time I wished that I had went with the .44 Mag in the same configuration but now that I'm older I'm glad I went and stayed with the .357/.38 round.
IMO the .44 mag in a handgun is for the younger folks.;)
 
I think the 44 with the traditional 240 grainers is a nasty recoiling round. I like the 300 grain bullets though- Kaaathunk!


In a little lever, the 357 shines. I don't know aboutr Elk, but deer, coyote, and loaded down for rabbit. Plus you could defend your homestead with one.


munk
 
Yvsa said:
I have one of the .357/.38 and love it. I bought a .357 Ruger Security Six when I was in Oregon and understood the cartridge was going to be legal for elk so that set off the desire for the carbine.
For a long time I wished that I had went with the .44 Mag in the same configuration but now that I'm older I'm glad I went and stayed with the .357/.38 round.
IMO the .44 mag in a handgun is for the younger folks.;)

Unless it's the .44 special. Truly a cartridge for reloaders and firearms aficianados. I don't have one, but am actively looking.
I've got a M92 Rossi in .45 Colt. Not all that high velocity, but puts a hell of a spank on things.
 
I once found a SS SW N frame 44 special for 275 in a pawn shop. I did not buy it because I was broke, would have had to borrow the money, and already had 2 or 3 41's....but geeze, I wish I had.



munk
 
A couple of decades back, the M1 Carbine loaded with either soft points or hollow points had the record for best stopping power ever amassed by the NYPD. Riot Guns, SxS double barrel shotguns called whippets in 12 or 20 ga., etc., and all the others used to do stakeout and felony warrent arrests - the little Carbine held the record for one shot put downs. Some of it's record probably came from it's unimtimidating recoil, some from being short and handy and able to be used with precision in close quarters.

It was an anomaly that had everyone trying to figure out why.

A 357 lever gun would probably equal it with today's high technology bonded- core bullets driven 400 or 500 fps faster than they were designed for.
 
I've seen mention of the Carbine working well for police before. Common sense tells us that soft/hollowpoints would be more effective than ball ammo but the discrepency seems large. If this mystery is ever solved I for one would love to see the results.

I personally own a 1944 Inland, all matching numbers, with the usual accessories. I hadn't even been planning on buying one, it kind of ended up in my lap. I consider it collectible and don't shoot it often but it certainly is fun to shoot. Would I take it to war? Not as my first choice. Would it be a better choice than a pistol? Yes. Would it be a better choice than my fingernails? Certainly, ball ammo or no. (Even without any ammo, it would be a better choice than my fingernails.)

Guns are tools, nothing more. Even a lousy tool is usually better than bare hands. A good shot with a .22 scares me far more than an incompetent shot with an M14.
 
Common sense tells us that soft/hollowpoints would be more effective than ball ammo but the discrepency seems large. If this mystery is ever solved I for one would love to see the results.>>>>> Satori

The mystery has been solved, for many years now. Ball ammo does not deform as well and impart energy. If my memory is correct, the M1 Carbine round has about or over a 1000 foot pounds of energy. This is way more than a 357. Ball drills through; soft or hollow point expands from tiny diameter to large and produces impact damage. My memory may be faulty, but the principle is true; small and fast and hard passes; small and soft expands and delivers.

Why else could a 3006 take a Coastal Brown Bear with a 165 grain bullet?
You hunt game all the time with relatively small weights at high velocity. The sectional density of the M1 carbine 110 gr soft point bullet is bad. But for human sized targets, it does the job

munk
 
Back
Top