OT: Work work work

As I sit here reading these great replies, Norm, Kismet, Yvsa, ZOO, Kronck, Hollow, Howard, and anyone else I missed...

I am reminded that there are some DAMN fine people here.

These words and stories you have given me are what I need.

By the way Norm, you're an animal. I have alot of respect for you.

Zoo, I think it's payback time.

Any of ya'll in Toronto Canada, 25 year old scotch, my treat.
 
Dave, Hope you are getting off you hours soon? or is that your
perm. sch anyway I feel for ya tonight is my last day of 16 hr days:D
I have been here for all to long and its time to take my little
girl to sea world. Hang in there and next time you see your boss punch
him once for me:grumpy:

Zoo
 
Really sucks, don't it?

My life took a bad turn in 1987 when another department member was retired in place and I got 90% of his duties in addition to my own. Same happened in 1992 -- only it was 100% 'cause the guy was gone. (Could I do the work of three? Hell no.) The pits was 1994-1995. We were cut by 50% and the work of the missing was "rationalized consistent with the new structure." One stretch went 173 days without a "day off" -- at least ten hours a day. The "year without Christmas." ("Overtime," what's that?)

Why? Because Ameritech wanted us to be "team players" -- to "go the extra mile." That was Ameritech corporatespeak for doing more and more with less and less and less -- "downsizing,""right-sizing,""restructuring,""cultural change,""take personal responsibility for company success,""Breakthrough,""bottom-up leadership," blah, blah, blah. :rolleyes:

About every three months we'd have management pep rallies where we would all write letters of resignation and then write applications for employment explaining why Ameritech should give us the honor of being hired. Some were not hired.

The beatings continued until moral improved, and it never improved. (CEO after 10% layoffs in 1993: "Why are they unhappy, they kept their jobs. Maybe we got rid of the wrong ones.")

Management employees who put in a sub-fifty hour week were written up for "poor attendance."

The corporate officers, natch, were all gone when I got down to the garage at 9 or 10 (and they weren't in at 8 AM either). Never saw them on Saturdays or Sundays either (I'm sure they were "working at home -- thinking deep, "strategic" thoughts.)

Only saving grace is that my son was grown up and out of the nest by then.

What's the lesson? Companies, with very few exceptions, are simply there to make maximum $$$ for the officers and share-holders. For the most part, a boss may - MAY - look out for you if your make him/her look good. That's about the best you can expect. Companies will screw you over without a qualm. It's their nature. (Bill Gates: "Life is not fair." Annon: "Have something they want to buy at a price you will accept.")

(Actually, there was one exception at Ameritech-- my direct superior. He thought loyalty went down as well as up and tried to place everyone when they "restructured" in 1994. He pushed hard. Half the folks lost their jobs anyway, and he was demoted. He later was restored to his previous rank, had a heart attack at fifty, retired a couple of years later, and teaches school. But, then, he always walked point in Nam.)

Keep on keeping on -- and looking for a better situation.
 
Awww the point man.

Definition: "Officier"

You there soldier. Go run into that clearing so that when the enemy shoots at you, we'll know where they are and I'll head off in the opposite direction.
 
Dave, I'm sure your comment has a lot of truth to it, people being as they are, but this guy was "Daddy," the First Sgt., and assigned himself the point. The three "butter bars" that rotated through in his year in the Nam were happy to have that arrangement.
 
Thomas, you said very well several things I wanted to say, but my post was certainly long enough as it was!

I remember very similar situations. It is amazing how utterly clueless our (and your obviously!) "Directors" were about what motivated people. In 1991 WordStar discontinued the 401K program and used the 200K saved to hire another marketing droid from soon to be defunct Ashton-Tate, who brought with him all the incompetence and stupidity that made that company a slug on the software market. Top-heavy, inefficient, horribly bureaucratic. Did wonders for morale to tell folks their 401K got tossed so that another marketing idiot could dig the hole we were in even deeper.

When I announced I was leaving in 1992, the VP actually called Phillipe Kahn at Borland and tried to get the offer rescinded. He told me that the company would be back on it's feet in a year, and we would have a QA department to rival Borland's. I just laughed. We had maybe 10 people left at the time, and Borland was running two full test labs with almost 100 people in QA alone, and had facilities and test systems you could only dream of. Since I turned him down he tried to ruin the job for me, and told me I was "disloyal" for leaving the company! After all the hours I gave them? I told him he could go to hell. Just a few months later they were history.

Posturing fools. I hate to sound arrogant, but there is not one company I have worked for that I could not have done a better job managing than the fools I reported to, all of whom either got promoted because of the work we did, or got enormous golden parachutes if they did get the axe they deserved.

I used to say they got Golden Parachutes and the rest of us got Golden Showers! (-: Still fits.

Norm
 
Worst I pull is about 54 hr. weeks. Not all that bad, really. Pays all right for a student. And as a student addicted to knives and guns, I can't really complain. Anyhow, my hours are being cut back and I intend to spend a lot of time with those I love and the local shooting range! :D

Nam
 
Back
Top