Beginning in 2003 I began researching knives to find acceptable replacements for the pieces Gerber was no longer making.
My wife and I had decided to spend more time doing outdoorsy type stuff, and my shopping trip to "pick up a couple of new Gerbers" came to an abrupt halt when I discovered that . . . much had changed since my last Gerber purchase in the early eighties.
So I started on a sort of quest to find
a) suitable replacements, and
b) what there was out there that would work well for me.
In the course of this exploration, I ordered a whole bunch of different knives in different styles and sizes. In the beginning, quite a few of them were from Pakistan. The reason was simple: they were pretty cheap, and I could buy twenty different sizes and styles to try out without going broke. I learned very early on that large knives don't really suit me. I found this when I bought a number of large Bowie-style knives. Almost all made in Pakistan. I tried some others in smaller sizes, several of which were also from Pakistan.
Over a period of months I found patterns that suited me well, though none of those came from the Pakistan/India regions. I also discovered that -- generally speaking -- the materials, designs, craftsmanship, and fit & finish on the great majority of my Pakistani knives was well below what I was used to. Steel that was shiny, but wouldn't hold an edge. Handles that didn't fit the tang. Badly uneven grinds and irregular bevels. Rivets and bolsters and guards badly fitted, with rough edges and protruding lips. It was a parade of slipshod workmanship.
The crowning moment was when I purchased a box of razor knives (two blades: one is a clip point, the other is a straight razor) that were advertised as "Solingen" steel. Photo of the ricasso showed "Solingen" and the carefully chosen photo angles seemed to show a reasonable quality knife. When the box arrived, it was immediately clear that the advertising was intentionally misleading. Fit-n-finish stank. Grinds were uneven and inconsistent from one knife to the next. And way out toward the tip of the blade, where you would never bother to look for it . . . "Pakistan" in a lovely, subdued laser etch. The knives were crap. I still have them. I can't think of anyone I dislike enough to inflict them on.
Amid all this sub-par stuff were a couple of gems. I got a little sodbuster with a leather sheath and green wood handles. Absolutely no blade markings. Surprisingly stiff spring, and -- hallelujah! -- someone had heat treated the blade. It actually holds an edge. Another surprise was an "Old Smoky" skinner with the cheap-n-cheesy colorful wood handles and advertised as having been "made from a file." When I got it, along with "Pakistan" the blade stamp proclaimed "stainless," right there beside all the cross-hatching that simulated the metal of a file stock. And it came in a faux leather sheath that truly stank of some kind of petrochemical derivation. I hated it instantly. They had lied to me:
nobody makes files out of stainless steel. It was fake in just about every conceivable way.
I threw it in the kitchen junk drawer to be used for opening packages. A year later it still didn't need sharpening. The sheath had ceased to exude that pungent stench. It stayed in the drawer. They had lied to me. Another year later it still didn't need sharpening. I sharpened it anyway. Interesting. It had a kind of convex bevel. I carefully did what I could to improve the edge and put it back in the drawer. I've had that knife for nearly eight years now. It still lives in the kitchen junk drawer. It still opens packages with ease. I sharpen it once a year, but it never really needs it. I don't hate it any more. Hey, they lied to me, and so what? The fake leather sheath turns out to be durable. The blade turns out to be durable. It holds an edge. I honestly believe it would skin a deer.
Also, one of the "Bowie" knives actually turned out to have decent steel and a pretty fair edge. Too big for my purposes, but not an altogether horrible knife.
So, out of [a bunch] I got, what, three keepers?
I no longer buy Pakistani knives. I can get sub-standard steel from China that has a better fit-and-finish. Random Chinese knives currently exhibit quality more reliably than random Pakistani knives.
Aside from the outright dishonesty I experienced with a couple of my purchases, I found that, on the whole, the quality simply wasn't there. Always? No, I did get some good pieces. A couple of them I actually use. Most of them sit in boxes, where they won't remind me of my sojourn into completely classless cutlery in those early days of profound ignorance.
I won't speculate on why it is that there is so much inconsistency in the quality of blades originating in Pakistan. The guys in the previous posts have offered some very plausible explanations.
I just know that while they
ought to be able to make awesome knives, I've simply not seen enough evidence of consistent quality to inspire sufficient confidence in me to resume buying them.
My current Asian rating system runs something like this:
| yuck, way too inconsistent |
| meh, some good, some bad, getting better |
| generally good, some outstanding |
| generally very good, many outstanding |
It's possible that won't match everyone's experience, however it's my current policy foundation for Asian quality.