I don't want to rattle anyone's cage but I'm a little bit puzzled as to why some folk artificially force a patina on a new knife. Surely part of the appeal of a carbon steel blade is both the ease of keeping it razor sharp and watching the colour change over time as it gets used?
A lot is said about carbon blades having 'soul' in a way that stainless don't. If you force a patina aren't you 'forging' its life story?
Jacknife, in his wonderful stories frequently touches on this aspect and I always feel myself nod in sympathy to his astute aesthetic.
I'm no zealout and happily carry stainless and carbon blades but when I look at my 40 year old Sheffield pen knife, it's near black blade speaks to me of countless childhood adventures on the Scottish hills and moors. Making bows and arrows, 'war clubs', as we called them. Gutting brown trout and cutting sticks to roast them, shaving feathersticks for fires and climbing trees to carve my name at the highest point I could reach. It was an inexpensive boy's knife, a 2" blade and a plastic handle, festooned with the picture of a giraffe and the word 'Africa'. Now, it still 'walks and talks' is scary sharp and not a hint of rust.
My taste in knives has come full circle, from the usual suspects you can easily guess at, back to traditional slippies, helped a little by our draconian carry laws. But, and it's a big but, a good small slippie can quite literally do it all, at least for this Jock.
I like the idea of a knife used hard, treated well and telling its own true tale.
Also, these forced patinas look wrong to me, far too uniformly grey, almost like a factory finish. In fact, are Case et al missing a trick? Could this be the next big trend in the footsteps of 'pocket worn'? They could maybe be called 'Pre-Patinated'.
Of course, this begs a few questions as I like pocket worn, does this make me a hypocrite?
Anyway, I'm starting to ramble but I would like to hear other views on this.
I do apologize if it's all been done to death already!