Lanny just composed a long story to complain that he was
scamed one knife in an international deal through paypal.
Now I want to discuss the rule fairness. Yes, most of guys
are honest good guys. But the buyer send out the meney first
and then he began to bear the suffering of waiting for his knife.
At last he did not got it. How bad could it be! Why the rule is
not the seller send out the knife first, after the buyer got the knife
then pay for it. Since obviously the pay is much faster than the delivery of knives. Just a few minutes. Somebody would say that
it is too risky for the sender. But now the rule is the same to the buyer. At last even if he got refund after the investigation of paypal he would got a bad comment BAD GUY by the seller.
Why is it so hard for the truth to appear?
----As I know even one little package ,the reception need put down his signature in the notebook of the post man.------
scamed one knife in an international deal through paypal.
Now I want to discuss the rule fairness. Yes, most of guys
are honest good guys. But the buyer send out the meney first
and then he began to bear the suffering of waiting for his knife.
At last he did not got it. How bad could it be! Why the rule is
not the seller send out the knife first, after the buyer got the knife
then pay for it. Since obviously the pay is much faster than the delivery of knives. Just a few minutes. Somebody would say that
it is too risky for the sender. But now the rule is the same to the buyer. At last even if he got refund after the investigation of paypal he would got a bad comment BAD GUY by the seller.
Why is it so hard for the truth to appear?
----As I know even one little package ,the reception need put down his signature in the notebook of the post man.------