The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
I'm not going to bang my head against this wall, but here are the pictures for those who can't view them:
Is it just me? But i dont see any rust on any of the blades except the zdp&cts-xhp.
Thanks.
OP, those are water spots. Small deposits of minerals left behind after the water evaporates. Depending on your quality of water you might see these on your dishes. The reasons I believe this is more likely are:
- They look like water spots, not rust spots.
- They are easily rubbed off, just like water spots, not like rust spots.
- The water spots appear identical between multiple steels.
- You simply used drops of water that you let evaporate, which causes water spots.
- You didn't exhibit proper control of your water variable.
- You didn't conduct an actual soak test, which would be more appropriate.
Wipe off your blades and put down your pitchfork.
calc - you are correct, as well as those saying H1 does not rust.
THE RE-TEST:
Salt soak of H1 and palladium plate side by side. Palladium is a noble metal.
Both, H1 and palladium had the same spots after salt dried.
I stand corrected: only CTS-XHP and ZDP-189 showed true corrosion.
I'm glad I had the community help, now it is clear that H1, VG-10, M390 and Victorinox steels did not
show any trace of rust. The spots are solid residue from tap water.
Thanks to all.
I think your testing method is flawed a bit. H1 has no carbon in it and therefore scientifically CAN'T rust
Touche I did not know that. Thanks for the educationH1 contains 0.15% carbon. Not much but it's in there.
Touche I did not know that. Thanks for the education
Hm, not working for me. Still curious as to how this statement is valid here:
Many, many before you have run more rigorous testing than you with different results. This would imply that your issue is with your testing method rather than the material itself, especially given that your results contradict the material science to some extent.
Additionally, you still have yet to propose a possible explanation for your results, which is just bad science. You can't expect people to take you seriously when you say "Event A happened, then Event B happened, therefore Event A caused Event B" without offering an explanation of possible causation. There could have been other contributing factors, and yet you feel confident in ignoring all of them. Just from memory, there have been examples of:
- The H1 logo rusting.
- Traces of other steel from the factory tools rusting.
- The rust actually just being a mold of some sort that dried off after a few weeks.
None of these are examples of H1 rusting, but instead somebody jumping to conclusions. I agree with spketch that the fact that you have to be so gentle that you don't wash it off makes your claim rather dubious. The lack of experimental control and critical thinking even more so.
That the stains can be removed by rubbing with a finger
Thanks.
OP, those are water spots. Small deposits of minerals left behind after the water evaporates. Depending on your quality of water you might see these on your dishes.