- Joined
- Jan 15, 2013
- Messages
- 460
A Large jack knife pattern and a Green River style, maybe?
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
My father found a few of the Time Life Old West leather bound books when I was a kid. I don't remember any of the knives off the top of my head, but I do remember the book explicitly relating that high noon gun fights were a rarity. Most killing was done with a shotgun, at close range, usually from behind.
Ah, this thread reminds me!
I was at the museum in Fort Collins, CO around Christmas, and they had a little display of the personal effects of a soldier who had been posted there around 1865. So for what it's worth, Sergeant Luther Remington carried this:
![]()
My cellphone is a pretty horrible camera, but, from memory:
--Main blade is a sheepsfoot somewhere between 2.5" and 3"
--A small pen secondary is tucked in front of it, all but invisible in the picture
--Corkscrew and hoof pick(?) on the side opposite
--The handle seemed to be bone or ivory
All in all, it seemed like a pretty handy thing for a cavalryman to have, and quite a bit fancier than I would've expected.
Jack, I almost choked on my coffee reading that! That's classic and I'm going to look for it when I get home tonight. I'll post it here if I can find it. Maybe someone else will beat me to it hint hint nudge nudge.
[video=youtube;cey_4r-ILxs]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cey_4r-ILxs[/video]
I actually heard that song on the radio not too long ago, Jack. Our local NPR station has a program that's all folk music from the British Isles, and the host played that and a few other songs from the northern parts of England.
Thank you Ken, I couldn't recall who had that photo. I love it,, and it's surprising that in 1856, that display shows a really wide varriety of pocket knives, in both size and patterns. I'm always surprised at the congress patterns. I guess I always thought of the congress as a southern planter type of thing.
You're rght about the perception that everyone carried a Colt revolver. The darn thing cost more than most people made in a month or two. Not too mention there were Remngtons, Spiller and Burr, Adams, and a host of other guns more affordable. And every sodbuster, saloon or store keep, stage guard and marshall had a shotgun. Side by side barrels stuffed with blue whistlers end a fight real quick.
Carl.
There were quite a few revolvers out and available, and there were quite a few colts. After the CW, many would have bought surplus. Metallic cartridge pistols drove down the price of a cap and ball revolver which many used.... also some turned to conversions which were cheaper than Colt's 1873 Single Action Army. Even Bill Hickok stuck with .36 caliber cap and ball Colt 1851 Navy's till his death.
Thank you Ken, I couldn't recall who had that photo. I love it,, and it's surprising that in 1856, that display shows a really wide varriety of pocket knives, in both size and patterns. I'm always surprised at the congress patterns. I guess I always thought of the congress as a southern planter type of thing.
You're rght about the perception that everyone carried a Colt revolver. The darn thing cost more than most people made in a month or two. Not too mention there were Remngtons, Spiller and Burr, Adams, and a host of other guns more affordable. And every sodbuster, saloon or store keep, stage guard and marshall had a shotgun. Side by side barrels stuffed with blue whistlers end a fight real quick.
Carl.
I've heard the smith & wesson schofield was very popular as well. It was a break top revolver so you could reload it much easier even while on horseback. I imagine it was relatively cheap, since S&W kept getting government contracts for it cancelled.
I've heard the smith & wesson schofield was very popular as well. It was a break top revolver so you could reload it much easier even while on horseback. I imagine it was relatively cheap, since S&W kept getting government contracts for it cancelled.
From what I have read, there were far far more patterns then than there are today. It is surprising still. Pocketknives were big business
It worked for Clint in The Unforgiven!![]()
They were to an extent. It came out earlier than the Colt open tops or SAA, but didn't beat the slower to load Colts. I think that the SAA was more durable, fired a more powerful round, could fire the Schofield round (where the S&W couldn't fire the .45 Colt), and apparently didn't need to be cleaned as much as the S&W did. I guess those reasons are why the S&W didn't rule the west.
Don't forget the Remingtons, those were cool guns too.
Russia stayed with the S&W model 3 revolver right up to the adoption of the Nagant revolver at he dawn of the Bolshivek revolution. 1870 to 1915.
Not to mention that domestic U.S. sales of the S&W revolvers was but a small drop in the bucket of the overall sales of Smith and Wesson. When they held the patent on the bored through cylinder and Colt still had to stick with the cap and ball revolver, S&W went and got a huge amount of foreign contracts, to include a masive one with Russia, to arm the Czar's troops with the top break revolvers. Hence the model the Smith and Wesson Russian. Over the last part of the 19th century, Russia and other European countries and Latin American countries bought so many S&W revolvers that S&W could almost ignore U.S. sales. However, Wells Fargo and some other organizations bought the top breaks for their guards, and it was a favorite with some of the Youngers and Daltons.
George Custer was a fan of them, but I don't think it did him any good in the end.
Russia stayed with the S&W model 3 revolver right up to the adoption of the Nagant revolver at he dawn of the Bolshivek revolution. 1870 to 1915.
Carl.
Folks,
I don't think I can contribute to this thread in any decent way. The only thing I know, is that it's hard for me to believe that people back then carried expensive knives. Not on average, at least. For the same reason why, in 100 years from now, I guess no one should think that every motorbiker in early 2000's rode a Ducati or every farmer drove a Hummer.
Anyway, I just wanted to say thanks cause I'm really enjoying this thread so you can go on full throttle
Fausto
![]()