Poll: Sebenza; Large, Small, Regular, Classic?

[The General]

I think all the "is the Sebenza able to cut an engine block in half and split the atom? Well it aught to at that price!"

Have snuck in and are trying to ruin the natural and obvious result!

LARGE CLASSIC MM!

But my small damascus woodie regular is very very nice...

 

[Aries59]

Large Classic MM was my choice when I had the Sebenza bug, but have been really impressed with some of the unique decorated ones and am getting the craving once again.

 

[Tom S]

Small Classic has been my EDC choice. I used to carry a Small regular but on some kind of mental lapse I sold it last year. Between the classic and regular, the classic just seemed to lock into my hand much better with the advantage of better access to the lock bar.

BTW, I'm sure I'll pick up a large classic in the next month or so.

 

[Nathan S]

I voted small classic because that's what I have. It's a wonderful knife. However, I'm going to be getting a large Sebenza in the next few months and I think I'll get a regular. It'll be for hard use, and I think the regular tip will hold up a little better. But either style is fine, really. What I really want is dual thumbstuds.

 

[zippophile]

I think that the Small, Classic Sebenza is the best for EDC. The ergonomics of the handle ( I like the finger recess for grip control and easier access to the thumlug ) and its practical size earn my vote, however, they are ALL excellent knives!

 

[lshay]

I love my small Classic as my 'workplace' EDC

I traded for a large Classic and did not like it at all? Immediately traded it for a large plain (I'd sold my large plain in a moment of stupidity ) and am happy again

I guess for me the Classic is the perfect small and the Plain is the perfect large (my large plain will be even more perfct when the slabs and clip get home from Bodycote with a new Boron Carbide coating!)