- Joined
- Sep 4, 2012
- Messages
- 418
Having handled both a XM-18 and XM-24 for an extended period of time, I've reached the following highly unpopular conclusion:
Hinderers are simply not worth the ridiculous second-market prices. Rick's elitist, gimmicky "only active LEO get reasonable prices only because my knives ARE EXXXTREME,DUDEZ" marketing has blown the reputation and quality of these knives far out of proportion. There is nothing magical or special about these knives when compared to the many other solid "hard use" options that cost a fraction of the price [Strider SNG/Benchmade 275/ZT 0560/CRK Large 25]. Any of those knives will match or out-perform a Hinderer at a fraction of the cost. And frankly, for a "hard use" knife that you intend to use vigorously, it does not make sense to drop large amounts of money considering the abuse the blade will be put through.
I'd take a CRK Sebenza 21/25 over either option any day of the week. Better quality control, fit and finish, warranty service, and pricing.
Hinderers are simply not worth the ridiculous second-market prices. Rick's elitist, gimmicky "only active LEO get reasonable prices only because my knives ARE EXXXTREME,DUDEZ" marketing has blown the reputation and quality of these knives far out of proportion. There is nothing magical or special about these knives when compared to the many other solid "hard use" options that cost a fraction of the price [Strider SNG/Benchmade 275/ZT 0560/CRK Large 25]. Any of those knives will match or out-perform a Hinderer at a fraction of the cost. And frankly, for a "hard use" knife that you intend to use vigorously, it does not make sense to drop large amounts of money considering the abuse the blade will be put through.
I'd take a CRK Sebenza 21/25 over either option any day of the week. Better quality control, fit and finish, warranty service, and pricing.