The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
...when I send Peters some HC its gonna get the industry recipe...
It shouldn't amuse you... it kinda makes sense. Most users/testers in these challenges are concerned more with performance, than how it is made. You could esily get away with having several operations outsourced. I am only talking about qualifying a "Maker Challenge". IMO, it should be run differently than a "Knife Challenge". If part of the judging was based on the sheath design and build, would someone who had Paul Long make theirs be allowed to submit it? Edge retention, toughness and strength ARE critical factors in these challenges. Heat treatment plays a major role.It amuses me that the only people who ever seem to get wound up about who does their own HT aren't customers or reviewers or testers... just folks who do their own HT.
Thanks man...I guess I'm on some ignore list.JBS, I haven't looks but it's probably in the Wilderness Skills section. They do different challenges every so often.
randy
Absolutely not, bud. That wasn't the point of this thread. We have already agreed in the W&SS Challenge that HT outsourcing is fine. This latest contest had the parameters outlined.
Back to the challenge thing, what is this ? You mean like a cutting competition ?
Jason
The best heat-treat in the world (no matter who does it) won't make a round bar cut. A well-ground or forged blade that's completely annealed will cut very well - just not for very long.
If part of the judging was based on the sheath design and build, would someone who had Paul Long make theirs be allowed to submit it?
I am only talking about qualifying a "Maker Challenge". IMO, it should be run differently than a "Knife Challenge".
Edge retention, toughness and strength ARE critical factors in these challenges. Heat treatment plays a major role.
Interesting that there are some votes for sharpening and finishing being outsourced in this poll.
It amuses me that the only people who ever seem to get wound up about who does their own HT aren't customers or reviewers or testers... just folks who do their own HT.
.
Thanks, Stacy... that is what this thread is about. I was targeting a particular scenario that pops up every now and then. It may simple be an issue of semantics.The thing that needs to be considered in any response to this thread is the OP question...which is about entering a knifemakers challenge, not about how people make knives.
I think we all agree that farmed out HT is hard to beat.
I guess I should just man up and accept that this is my stance, too. Anything else, and I think the title of the challenge needs to be changed. It is important to note that I feel this logic only applies to maker challenges.In a knifemaker's challenge I firmly believe that the ONLY acceptable outsourcing is smelting the steel (although I would love to do a stone to blade challenge if I had a couple of weeks free time or my press build finished)
-Page
Eggs-Zachary... I think folks are getting confused, which could be my fault for not explaining properly. Some contests require specific rules to keep their title relevant. Don't call it a maker's challenge if you are only interested in the final product.If it is a challenge for knifemakers to MAKE a knife, then the only entries acceptable should be a knife they MADE.