I doubt anyone can top this. I had a grandmother-in-law (widow of my grandfather) who, at age 60-or-70-something, got romantically involved with a guy maybe in his 40s. Said guy was apparently a drug user and dealer. He moved into her retirement-community house. From the news accounts, he was apparently using her garage to cook methamphetamine.
He also beat her bloody on an occasion or two.
Obviously, the somewhat-distant connections between her and the rest of my family were not such that we could persuade her to move out. But it seems she finally did--with a little help from the DEA and the local drug-enforcement task force.
The cops apparently figured out who was cooking meth in the retirement community. Went in in a pre-dawn raid and arrested both ex-grandmother-in-law and meth-cooking boy toy. My first hint was when I checked my computer and saw the news headline proclaiming a drug bust in a retirement community. I thought, "Nah--it couldn't be them. . . . Could it?" I remember opening the article and seeing the names. "OH, S___!", I said.
I have to hand it to the cops: they handled it brilliantly. They seated ex-grandma-in-law and meth-cooking-boyfriend on the house's front lawn--where the gathering crowd of reporters and TV cameramen proceeded to ask them question after question. The cops didn't even have to waste their own tape. From the coverage I saw, the two arrestees screeched inconsistent and guilt-proving excuse after excuse--TO THE PRESS. I may be a little rusty on what counts as a police interrogation that requires Miranda warnings and (unless waived) presence of one's attorney--but I bet being asked for your story by the TV news on your front lawn isn't it.
Every second of tape, I'm reasonably confident, would be as admissible as Hell. I mean, what more could a police department ask for? We're not talking grainy security-camera footage, or something shot through a two-way mirror: we've got multiple camera angles, good lighting, state-of-the-art sound equipment--and all the cops had to do was walk back and forth in the background, carrying chemicals out of the garage.
Meth-chef-boyfriend said that he'd heard that there were recipes for meth on the internet, was appalled, and had decided to experiment to see if these terrible rumors were true. He seems to have thought that that somehow rendered his meth-making exploit something other than criminal.
I hear that her defense attorney found out what had happened only when he heard the interviews on his car radio.
I had the unique and uncomfortable experience of listening to the radio on the way home, flipping from channel to channel, and hearing incredulous press accounts of this outlaw in-law on every freaking station. I even got to see footage of the county sheriff standing on the front lawn where my little brother and I used to play as kids--he's standing there, pontificating that "Grandmothers should be making cookies--not meth!"
Happily, the courts seem to have sorted things out about right. Ex-grandmother-in-law seems not to have had her house forfeited; may have received some light punishment for some kind of personal drug use, but meth-chef-boyfriend got an appropriately-longer sentence. Which was still not much, but enough to give her room to move him out of her life. She has since straightened her life out pretty well, I gather. As for him, I haven't heard a peep for a few years.