- Joined
- Feb 18, 2016
- Messages
- 2,209
I think you got that twisted Justin.
The chemistry is what decides the carbide type and carbide volume ranges.
It is the carbide type and volume that plays one of the biggest role in controlled edge wear.
On Larrin's graph, you can see that there are lots of softer steels than AEB-L at ~64rc that still cut more even though they are softer HRC they still cut more mm of card stock (S90v, Vanadis 8, etc for example)
The higher volume of harder carbides in a sufficiently hard matrix resisted being worn better than a steel that had a even harder matrix with less carbides and softer carbides.
Also, there were some steels that had more carbide volume and higher matrix hardness but the carbide types were softer so also those did not cut as long such as 10v at 17% volume vs ZDP at 30% plus. Yet, softer 10v at lower carbide volume cut longer because of the Carbide type.
So chemistry is very important for wear resistance potential.
Larrin's article is always worth another read lots of good stuff in there to dig into.
https://knifesteelnerds.com/2020/05/01/testing-the-edge-retention-of-48-knife-steels/
You're right my apologies. Still cant get over how good s30v is at 64-65 lol
That CBN stone you used is pretty interesting I'm gonna have to try that out