- Joined
- Feb 28, 2002
- Messages
- 13,348
I use a basic cost per inch of blade length plus materials/consumables to get a baseline. Adding extras such as hamon, stag, bling etc. comes after that. And as I stated before, honest research where you stand will be your final adjustment. I dont necessarily rely on an hourly labor rate.
Brett
Correct - whether one calls that the first or final adjustment, market position will be the most meaningful factor in ultimately setting a price. Cost of materials and time are important considerations to be sure, but newer makers tend to be inefficient with both - so using this as a baseline for market price early on can be misleading. Coop expressed the market reality well in describing the early stages as getting paid to learn.
When I look at the time invested in making my first (and only) few knives, paying myself any kind of a remotely reasonable hourly rate, plus cost of materials (didn't know how much belts cost 'til I started using them up) would net out to a cost base that would already significantly exceed any reasonable market value for the knives in question. Marking up from there to "cover my costs" would be an excercise in self-delusion.
When you're starting out, developing your skills and efficiency, getting both performance feedback and critical assessment (fit / finish / design / aesthetics / ergonomics etc.) from peers and customers are what's most important. Profitability does not generally happen right out of the gate, and the reality is that it can take a little while.
On the exposure question, by all means use magazine publications and awards to their full promotional effect.
Last edited: