The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
The sheath is a compromise in many ways and I realise that that will put some folk off. In the end though, I aimed for as much functionality as I could. It would have been easy to have just copied the original Woodlore sheath, or something like that. Apart from then suffering the slings and arrows of all the forum members for “cloning” an existing, albeit functional and popular, design, I really wanted to try to offer something different. The original Woodlore sheath came in three versions, left or right belt, and baldric style. This Spyderco sheath was intended to fulfil all those roles, and more, in one package.
Firstly, the sheath is meant to be ambidextrous. Over at BCUK there are several members of the moderating crew who are lefties and they all petitioned very hard for us to make an effort to have a sheath that could accommodate the 10% or so of the population who are similarly afflictedIt also appealed since Spyderco are more usually known for plastic or Kydex, which is frequently ambidextrous.
I fully expected that a fire steel loop would be demanded by the people I talked with. I personally have never had such a sheath and have but rarely wished it were otherwise. Certainly there can be advantages, but I have seen ferrocerium rods make a horrid mess of leather when they have got wet. The rods can corrode and leave a lot of gunk on the sheath. It surprised me when pretty much all the other mods I talked to, along with expedition leaders and instructors in outdoor skills said that a firesteel loop was a low priority. We expanded on that by deciding that we should concentrate on designing something which was just a sheath. If we started adding to it we would soon have it festooned with pouches and loops for all sorts of other “essential” gear… at double the original price
![]()
In cold climates it can be handy if one hangs the knife around ones neck, tucking it just inside the outer layer or so of clothing. Sheaths can have a tendency to twist and spin if a cord is just run through the belt loop, so the top set of eyelets allow for a more stable hanging arrangement.
Using the first and second eyelets allow the sheath to hang at an angle so that it can be carried under the arm with the handle facing forward. This is another carry that a number of outdoorsmen and instructors I know seem to like.
To prevent the knife flapping around when one bends forward, a short length of braided paraccord, or something with a monkey’s fist on the end, can be attached to the bottom holes and tucked under the belt.
I thought about how to add a dangler, another popular mode of carry, but decided that the added complication and cost was probably more than we wanted to do. From a merely functional point of view rigging a dangler through the existing loop, or even just with cord to the eyelets, should not be too much of a problem.
My personal preference for carrying a knife is horizontal front cross draw and while this was not something that my prototype was able to do, the first prototype that Sal sent me could be rigged with 4mm accessory cord to ride quite securely in this position. The sheath held the knife very securely and I had no concerns about it coming loose. Obviously this security can change over time as a sheath loosens up with use.
Regarding the depth of the pouch, it is my belief, looking at those pictures, that the knife has not always been fully inserted into the sheath. On the manufactured prototype that I handled there was a noticeable tightening of the sheath about an inch before the handle was fully home. I expect that this will ease some with use.