Jerker, I am not sure how this will come across in print, but I think I know what you are saying. It makes me think of how people use things according to how they percieve them.
Think of a Sebenza. The large majority of owners use them for jobs that most people could use any tool for. Because of their price, the knives are used VERY lightly. It makes me think that a steel could be graded as an expensive, specialty steel, and then people would percieve that it's use would need to be commensurate with the way it is graded.
The steel could be the same basic composition, but it's price and description would suggest something other than general use. Then, heat treat specs could be given for that steel that would push the line a little.
As I understand, there are certain Spyderco knives designed for a thin edge and lighter cutting tasks. Those who buy those knives do so with the realization that more care will be required in use. Kind of like the SG2 Kershaws.
If a steel was graded/priced differently, wouldn't this have the same effect, even if the formula was basically the same? One steel could have a more forgiving heat treat, and another, with a different price, could carry a higher end, more rigid heat treat sequence, though both are of very similiar composition?