PUMA Tac I vs. Tac II

B

Bridgeman

Joined
Oct 1, 2005
Messages
820
Here are the specs as shown on Puma's web site. Does ANYone know how these knives differ besides the 10 gram difference in weight? If that is the only difference, what makes the Tac II 10 grams lighter?

Thanks,
Bridge

132006 PUMA Tac II

blade length: 6-2/7 "
blade thickness: 5 mm
total length: 12-1/5 "
knife weight: 300 gr
scales: ABS
steel / hardness: 440A / 55-57 HRC


132000 PUMA Tac I

blade length: 6-2/7 "
blade thickness: 5 mm
total length: 12-1/5 "
knife weight: 310 gr
scales: ABS
steel / hardness: 440A / 55-57 HRC
 
I don't know wether you've used any of the new Pumas, they are NOT nearly as good as the old yellow and green box ones. Puma has an incredible reputation as "THE" knife in Argentina, I tried out some of the new ones and was very dissapointed. I think that they are overpriced for the quality you get. I have a couple of old ones and they are awesome.
 
I've got a Puma Tac 1 and it's great for thought bushcraft job...chopping, digging, hammering ect...but you got to get a deal on them 'cause they're really expensive. I got mine for $89,00 cdn. Cheers!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top