Working myself into a buying frenzy so when I sober up out of it I'll have a tommi puukko lol.
They are mighty expensive, but they are might nice too.
I cant really imagine that--performance wise--they're going to have any significant advantage over a much cheaper puukko, aside from the sheath maybe. What could they do differently anyway? Perhaps a distally tapered blade?
I expect most of the difference would be in a flawless fit/finish and hand picked burled wood for the best figure.
Am I wrong?
What do you guys think of the more moderately priced hand forged puukkos, like the AK line? They dont have the showiness, but theyre around 1/2 the price, at least.
I really like the idea of one very experienced man working on the blade, handle and sheath, from start to finish, but I've got myself wondering, what practical differences are there between hand forged blades, and say the Lauri blades (C-0,81 Mn-0,56 S-0,004 P-0,01 Si 0,35 V-0,161 Cr-0,540 similar to silversteel, but lower carbon)?
I have a progression tempered Lauri and the blade seems very nice, perfectly straight, even grinds, good even hamon line. Not sure what could be done to make it better.