vnvman
Basic Member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2024
- Messages
- 202
Yeah, it's one of those threads...
Honestly I didn't have much luck with my latest Spyderco purchases in general, and the last knives I bought in order from oldest to newest are:
PM2 in S45VN: perfect
PM2 in Cruwear: perfect
Endela in K390: uneven grind by the tip and dark burn marks on the edge. It was a user so yeah, I just dealt with it.
Salt 2 in LC200N: perfect
Endura SE VG10: perfect
Spydiechef: perfect
Massad Ayoob Cruwear: super uneven tip, very asymmetrical grind, complete disaster. I turned it into a scandivex and got a partial refund from the seller.
Delica Wharncliffe in K390: uneven grind from tip to heel. No biggie, sharpened away.
PM2 in Cruwear: scales looking way different from one another, not only terms of color but in terms of coarseness. Other than that okay. Kept it.
Para 3 LW in 15V: unevenly ground tip, weird grind marks on spine. Kept it because I couldn't find another one anyway and I didn't want to risk missing out on the 15V
Millie 2 15V: one of the screws on the handle has a the hole that is WAY off center, the tip is unevenly sharpened (exactly like the Para3 LW). Also, the tip seems to be a lot thinner than normal, like way thinner than on both the PM 2 and the Para 3 that I have, a real needle point. Action perfect, centering perfect. Given the odds of getting a perfect one, I grabbed a spare screw from an older beater and swapped it (only cosmetic but it irked me on a 300€ knife), and I decided that knock on wood I can live with the thinner tip, although I reckon it could be a total deal breaker for many: me personally I'm using this only for pure slicing and food prep tasks so I don't mind. Also, the liners kinda look "rough" to my eye where they are exposed, like there were some small half ass jimps. I'm posting a sample pic of the M2 next to my Crucarta PM2, if you can tell the difference.
Legit question. In my opinion out of the last ones bough 6/11 have been (some degree of) a lemon so far. Am I just being too picky and or OCD, or something is slightly off with QC as of late?
I've gotten to the point of accepting (at least what what I consider) flaws in order not to miss out on sprints and such in the search for the perfect specimen, that I probably have like 2/10 chance of getting anyway.
Is there something wrong? Is it just me? Or maybe I should just seel medical help?
I'd like to know your opinion and experience on your latest purchases.
Honestly I didn't have much luck with my latest Spyderco purchases in general, and the last knives I bought in order from oldest to newest are:
PM2 in S45VN: perfect
PM2 in Cruwear: perfect
Endela in K390: uneven grind by the tip and dark burn marks on the edge. It was a user so yeah, I just dealt with it.
Salt 2 in LC200N: perfect
Endura SE VG10: perfect
Spydiechef: perfect
Massad Ayoob Cruwear: super uneven tip, very asymmetrical grind, complete disaster. I turned it into a scandivex and got a partial refund from the seller.
Delica Wharncliffe in K390: uneven grind from tip to heel. No biggie, sharpened away.
PM2 in Cruwear: scales looking way different from one another, not only terms of color but in terms of coarseness. Other than that okay. Kept it.
Para 3 LW in 15V: unevenly ground tip, weird grind marks on spine. Kept it because I couldn't find another one anyway and I didn't want to risk missing out on the 15V
Millie 2 15V: one of the screws on the handle has a the hole that is WAY off center, the tip is unevenly sharpened (exactly like the Para3 LW). Also, the tip seems to be a lot thinner than normal, like way thinner than on both the PM 2 and the Para 3 that I have, a real needle point. Action perfect, centering perfect. Given the odds of getting a perfect one, I grabbed a spare screw from an older beater and swapped it (only cosmetic but it irked me on a 300€ knife), and I decided that knock on wood I can live with the thinner tip, although I reckon it could be a total deal breaker for many: me personally I'm using this only for pure slicing and food prep tasks so I don't mind. Also, the liners kinda look "rough" to my eye where they are exposed, like there were some small half ass jimps. I'm posting a sample pic of the M2 next to my Crucarta PM2, if you can tell the difference.
Legit question. In my opinion out of the last ones bough 6/11 have been (some degree of) a lemon so far. Am I just being too picky and or OCD, or something is slightly off with QC as of late?
I've gotten to the point of accepting (at least what what I consider) flaws in order not to miss out on sprints and such in the search for the perfect specimen, that I probably have like 2/10 chance of getting anyway.
Is there something wrong? Is it just me? Or maybe I should just seel medical help?
I'd like to know your opinion and experience on your latest purchases.