Steve Poll said:
Hi Dave:
My previous post on this thread was about someone purchasing kuks for the explicit purpose of self defense. I don't know of any sugar coated way to say this.
In my opinion, and solely my opinion, it's so far out as to not even be considered as a viable option. If one is attacked out in the woods, at the 7-11 or in their own home, taking the time to draw a heavy kuk and then engageing in a close quarters knife fight against a fast lighter knife is ludicrous and unrealistic.
If a person feels the need to have a weapon at hand in a life and death confrontation, a kuk ain't it. Get real.
There are no winners in a knife fight. If someone pulls a knife, run away or shoot him. If you think you are going to stand there and conduct a brillant knife attack, explain all you injuries to Blue Cross. Even if you survive, you will be cut up bad.
There are other experienced individuals on this list that will tell you the same thing if they spoke up. I just don't have the tact tonight to say nothing.
While I agree with a LOT of that...
Depending on just what you are using, speed is not EVERYTHING...
At some point, you start getting into the 'Don't bring a knife to a sword fight' category... Otherwise, throughout history, everyone would have been using only small knives and daggers, where in actual fact, they carried the biggest longest thing that their technology could produce, that would still allow them to be fast enough to score a hit...
A gun is, of course, MUCH better in almost all circumstances, but even people that use guns everyday often carry a knife for backup for when they are in a situation where someone is trying to get their gun away from them...
BUT... And this is a BIG BUT... from what I have read here, a gun is NOT an option where he lives...
I would suggest though, that a baseball bat would be almost, if not more useful to take out someone with a knife...
It would be very hard to stop a baseball bat with your hands, though admittedly a bit safer than trying to stop a LARGE khuk...