The type of oil we use has a direct relationship on the nature of the hardened portion of the blade. That is an obvious statement, but many times not well understood.
The only way to develop our heat treating is by reference testing. Every blade must at least be tested for cut and compared to a reference blade. Edge flex is not destructive to more than the citting edge that can be reground after the test. Thest two tests only evaluate cut and edge toughness.
The fully developed high performance blade must have more thorough testing to support it. I feel that overall blade strength and toughness are very significant attributes. These can only be evaluated through full flex tests. At first a single 90 degree bend was felt to be adequate. Now we have achieved up to 11 180 degree flexes with blades that had enough strength that they would not take a set due to hand strength with out the aid of an extension on the blade. The last blade did over 1,000 cuts on the hemp rope.
The tip of the blade on the test knife would easily engrave mild steel by tapping on the tang with a light hammer, without tip distortion.
If you are able to achieve this level of performance using other quenching mediums, you have done well. The main event is the testing you use to evaluate performance, the bladesmith who does not test thoroughly leaves the knife open to suprises. Most significantly he puts his clients at risk should they get into a wreck and need the blade to perform at higher levels than required by the average knife. If you are selling art knives the testing is irrelevant, if you claim high performance thorough testing is the foundation.