Quenching oils

Joined
Mar 31, 2008
Messages
118
I've always quenched in automatic transmission fluid. In the interest of consistency and quality, I'm going to make the switch to a sure-fire quenching oil like Parks or Brownells. I'd also be willing to use mineral oil if I could find it. I thought that first I'd see if some of ya'll would post what you are using, a supply source for it, and most importantly why you use it. ATF has worked pretty well for me so far (about 6 years), and I'm a bit nervous about switching to something new, but I know that there are other quenchants out there that work at least as well, and maybe some that work a little better. I don't want to go to something that's too fast, or something that's too slow. I forge with mostly 5160, O1 and 1084. I'm going to be trying out some 52100, W2, and 1095 in the near future. I make my own damascus out of 1084/15n20. Any feedback on quenches would be most appreciated. Thanks!
 
I bought some Parks from Darrel Ellis and use it on my 1095 and 1095/15N20 damascus. I used to use ATF and to tell the truth I would really love to see how much difference there is in the finished product. I can't tell from use or any of the field tests. I did get a line on a used Rockwell tester yesterday so maybe I will know more soon. For 1095 everyone swears by the Parks and it seems to work well for me. Doesn't stink like the ATF lol
 
I bought some Parks from Darrel Ellis and use it on my 1095 and 1095/15N20 damascus. I used to use ATF and to tell the truth I would really love to see how much difference there is in the finished product. I can't tell from use or any of the field tests. I did get a line on a used Rockwell tester yesterday so maybe I will know more soon. For 1095 everyone swears by the Parks and it seems to work well for me. Doesn't stink like the ATF lol

What temp are you using on the Parks?????:D
 
I leave it at room temperature. I know most warm their oil put, that doesn't seem to be the case with the P50 fast oil. It is really thin and waterery to start with. I keep mine in an old pressure cooker, I never do but a few at a time. I heat the steel to 1475 for the quench and then I do the double temper at 400 if that is what your asking. You can shave with the finished blades and the hold an edge well. don't chip. I don't chop bolts or nails and cut up metal siding so I don't know about abuse.:D
 
The first thing you need to ask yourself before bothering to switch to any particular quenchant is what differing results you are looking for. If sawing on a few pieces of rope, cutting through a couple of 2 x 4's or dressing a deer without heavy reshaping is your level of expectation for determining success, and you have it now- indeed why bother? The market is full of knives that will do this with glowing reviews that have probably been quenched in much worse ways than what you are currently doing. If you think that bending a knife like taffy is any type of credible hallmark then by all means a person should stick with what they have been using, an oil that can actually harden steel could really mess things up for you! If one is happy with the fact that they could put their knife directly into service with no temper and have good toughness, and tempering is just icing on the cake, switching to any other oil will be disastrous. But then eventually the oil you are using will betray you as well, as you are not in control of the process, the oil and the steel are.

However if you are a control freak who believes that knives are for cutting a variety of things as well as possible, then you may want to look for a quenchant formulated to do exactly what you want every time to the steel. You may want an oil that will achieve the maximum amount of martensite in hardening and then leave the final hardness up to you to control.

If we set the final steel condition aside, we can also discuss our quality of life in the shop. If we want pretty much the same results for a long time to come the quench oil may be a good upgrade. If we have problems with warping, cracking, stained up splotchy blades and burning eyes from who knows what toxins going into vapor then perhaps a product called quenching oil may be worth looking into for quenching.

All oils (or any old liquid) are not the same; ATF works a little better than 10W40 because it was designed with some cooling qualities in mind and not simply lubrication.
I have noticed the large amount of folks that say they use mineral oil, often citing a specific type such as Veterinarian use. All I can say is that I hope the specialized stuff has an entirely different viscosity than the common variety. I was using some pharmaceutical type mineral oil for another application (not quenching) the other day and it seemed like molasses compared to any quench oil I have ever used, prompting me to ask myself "people are quenching into this stuff??"

Some folks get bored with detailed explanations, so let’s look at on a basic level- hardening steel is simply a matter of avoiding it making a softer structure (pearlite) when cooling. The less soft stuff made, the harder the blade will be. This allows us to define success quite simply – the blade with the least amount of pearlite without cracking or twisting is our goal. If we are really fanatical about maximizing results this will haunt us, if skating a file or doing the common cutting that tasks that so far have failed to reveal any difference then we are content with another lever of results. Some people just mow their lawn, while others must groom it until it looks like a golf green, neither is better or worse, it is just a matter of different expectations.

Industry developed special quenchants because they do things with steel that far exceeds what we think a great knife could do, things that could cost serious fortunes or even lives if not nailed dead on. So I would consider all of these things and honestly ask if the quenchant we have is good enough of if there is something else we would like to achieve, and determine the course from there.
 
Kevin have you or anyone else noticed less warpage due to using a proper quenching oil versus using veg or mineral oil? You are able to eliminate the factor of uneven heat with the salt pots, so it would be interesting to know, I would imagine the more even cooling of an oil designed to cool things off would be more even than an oil like veg or peanut oil designed to abosrb and hold heat for cooking.
 
Kevin, I got the Parks because you and the reading I have done at your direction have convinced me of the importance of a proper HT. The whole cycle is critical. I spent the money on parks because it is closer to sure fired than ATF. I just have to be curious as to the results from the ATF. What was I making in the past? How hard does it get 1095 or W1. How does it look under a microscope? I really hope I can score the Rockwell tester at a reasonable price. I now have some D2 and basically all I can do is follow as closely as possible to the information and advice of those I believe in. I can do the rod test, cutting test etc. But I really don't know. I have decided to go with a good oven with a pid and top quenchants or methods.

On you one comment of industry and lives and fortunes. I use a punch press quite often at work. The punches are a mass produce item and when you think of the stress and watch the machine when it does something like punch a 13/16" hole thru a piece of 3/4" of 304 ss you have to appreciate what they do. I had a slot punch become misaligned once and a very small shard (a bit more than a bb if it would have been round) hit me in the jaw. It went thru my cheek upwards into my gum. It hit so hard it was like a a super hard punch. I was completely dazed and I thought I had must have lost a tooth and be all torn up. In the mirror just a small entrance hole and was able to pull the piece from my gum. The thought of a whole punch breaking off and flying around is horrifying.
 
I've always quenched in automatic transmission fluid. In the interest of consistency and quality, I'm going to make the switch to a sure-fire quenching oil like Parks or Brownells. I'd also be willing to use mineral oil if I could find it. I thought that first I'd see if some of ya'll would post what you are using, a supply source for it, and most importantly why you use it. ATF has worked pretty well for me so far (about 6 years), and I'm a bit nervous about switching to something new, but I know that there are other quenchants out there that work at least as well, and maybe some that work a little better. I don't want to go to something that's too fast, or something that's too slow. I forge with mostly 5160, O1 and 1084. I'm going to be trying out some 52100, W2, and 1095 in the near future. I make my own damascus out of 1084/15n20. Any feedback on quenches would be most appreciated. Thanks!

Redneckswami, I apologize, I can see that I went right into a speech without really addressing your questions, I have been doing this topic for so long that I tend to anticipate the typical direction it goes and get ahead of myself.

I use the quench oils I do for so many reasons I could burn up a whole lot of bandwidth listing them. You have a really wide range of steel listed and you need to break them down into two categories in order to assess your quenchant needs. 5160, O1 and 52100 are deep hardening ad will handle a slower oil better and fast oils could be stressful for them. 1084, 1095, 15n20 and W2 are all shallow hardening and need a faster oil to fully harden. You would actually be doing yourself a favor by steeling on two or three of these steels and becoming as familiar as possible with them, it that “jack of all trades- master of none” sort of thing.

A properly formulated quenchant will produce much less vapor, thus decreasing the likelihood of flashing, but more importantly it will allow more liquid to contact the steel and pull heat away evenly. It will be designed to stand up to 1500F steel being added to it again and again without breaking down, and it will not pit or discolor the surfaces nearly as bad. It will cool very quickly through the critical stage of pearlite formation and cool slower through the stressful later stage of hardening, basically it was meant specifically for the task at hand.


Kevin, I got the Parks because you and the reading I have done at your direction have convinced me of the importance of a proper HT. The whole cycle is critical. I spent the money on parks because it is closer to sure fired than ATF. I just have to be curious as to the results from the ATF. What was I making in the past? How hard does it get 1095 or W1. How does it look under a microscope? I really hope I can score the Rockwell tester at a reasonable price. I now have some D2 and basically all I can do is follow as closely as possible to the information and advice of those I believe in. I can do the rod test, cutting test etc. But I really don't know. I have decided to go with a good oven with a pid and top quenchants or methods.

On you one comment of industry and lives and fortunes. I use a punch press quite often at work. The punches are a mass produce item and when you think of the stress and watch the machine when it does something like punch a 13/16" hole thru a piece of 3/4" of 304 ss you have to appreciate what they do. I had a slot punch become misaligned once and a very small shard (a bit more than a bb if it would have been round) hit me in the jaw. It went thru my cheek upwards into my gum. It hit so hard it was like a a super hard punch. I was completely dazed and I thought I had must have lost a tooth and be all torn up. In the mirror just a small entrance hole and was able to pull the piece from my gum. The thought of a whole punch breaking off and flying around is horrifying.

I can see where you would have an appreciation for the care that industry has to take with getting things just right. Of course the most common bladesmiths answer to your punch dilemma is to make the punch so soft that it will just bend or flatten out instead of breaking; there would be very few holes made in anymore 304 stock, but that was only a secondary concern for a good punch anyhow. A good punch would bend back and forth endless times without breaking!;)

I can’t believe the number of knifemakers that cannot see the naivety of thinking they are pushing the envelope on steel treating in ways that industry has never dreamed of when you realize the stakes of not getting it right on a run of simple punches versus one knife that made 20 more cuts on a rope!!!:rolleyes: Let’s see, the metal in a jets landing gear, or your 4 inch drop point- which has more riding on the heat treatment??

With some steels you may find very little pearlite left after a dunk in ATF, others…well. But then even if you get 100% out of the steel you still have to look at all the other benefits in convenience and consistency. I used to play with different home made mixes for certain hamon effects in my blades but I was always struggling with getting it to come out the same as that one I liked. Then I switched to Heat Baths stuff and even if I take it from a different barrel two years later it seems to be the same high quality, but then If you think about it if the guys who make those punches suddenly had a few thousand come out wrong after using the newest batch of quenchant, that quenchant company is not going to be in business very long. The knifemaker dipping hot blades in bacon fat is not held to anywhere near that level of competency.

Kevin have you or anyone else noticed less warpage due to using a proper quenching oil versus using veg or mineral oil? You are able to eliminate the factor of uneven heat with the salt pots, so it would be interesting to know, I would imagine the more even cooling of an oil designed to cool things off would be more even than an oil like veg or peanut oil designed to abosrb and hold heat for cooking.

Sam, the answer to your question is yes! If heating is consistent there are two main areas where distortion can occur (main areas – the minor areas are infinite, it would appear:() On a shift from bcc to fcc and the shift back. On heating there will be expansion until austenite forms then there will be a drastic contraction until the conversion is complete, many of the recommended lower presoaks are for dealing with this issue, in order to allow the heat to equalize before passing through this dimensional change as evenly as possible. The next problem area is on the way down. Assuming you have not made any pearlite there will be contraction until around 450F, then martensite formation will cause huge expansion, if it doesn’t occur evenly there will be distortion (once again of you doubt this just watch what happens to a straight katana when the edge reaches 450F). Quench oils are designed to keep vapor jackets to a minimum, providing more even cooling. They are also designed to cool more slowly from 400F downward.
 
Kevin, what temp would you recommend for the Parks 50????

Some have read that Parks says it can be used at room temp. I have some older papers (I am sorry I cannot locate them right now in my dissster known as an office) that suggested around 130F so that is what I heat to and get very good results. But I know guys to how go into it with 10XX series steel steels at room temp. I have seen wonderful katanas, wild activiy and all, done in room temp #50.
 
Sam, the answer to your question is yes! If heating is consistent there are two main areas where distortion can occur (main areas – the minor areas are infinite, it would appear:() On a shift from bcc to fcc and the shift back. On heating there will be expansion until austenite forms then there will be a drastic contraction until the conversion is complete, many of the recommended lower presoaks are for dealing with this issue, in order to allow the heat to equalize before passing through this dimensional change as evenly as possible. The next problem area is on the way down. Assuming you have not made any pearlite there will be contraction until around 450F, then martensite formation will cause huge expansion, if it doesn’t occur evenly there will be distortion (once again of you doubt this just watch what happens to a straight katana when the edge reaches 450F). Quench oils are designed to keep vapor jackets to a minimum, providing more even cooling. They are also designed to cool more slowly from 400F downward.

Fantastic! It is amasing how much expansion and contraction goes on throughout each phase change, something I saw and felt firsthand during a railing job on a big S curve deck railing, we bent all the railing itself cold in the bending machine and installed it, then came back with a rosebud and the straight lengths of cap rail(because the cap rail could not be bent in the machine), as each peice of cap rail was heated and cooled off along a section while we bent it to the curves it would move like a snake depending on where it was heated, top bottom or sides. But the cap rail was mild steel, so I think the movement was caused only by the transfer to austenite and back to pearlite?
 
I'm using Parks 50 and AAA right now to harden my blades. (I got the oil from Darren Ellis at elliscustomknifeworks.com. Great guy to deal with.)

The reason I decided to get real quench oils is guys like Kevin and Tim Zowada. I make straight razors, and I want to get the best, most consistent results possible. Quench oil seems like one of those areas where the returns far outweigh the small investment.

My experience with Parks so far has been fantastic. To give you some idea, I use 1084 and O1 for my razors. The blades are usually around 3/4" wide. The spines are 1/4" thick, and I grind the hollows down to .025" or so prior to heat treatment. That's a pretty thin edge and an extreme difference in thickness. (The first time I ground one this thin I was expecting it to self-destruct.) I use a 2-brick forge to heat the blades, although I do control the heat with a thermocouple.

I use Parks 50, heated to 130 F using a little hot plate. I have yet to crack a blade in the quench. (I'm not sure whether this is because my steels are forgiving, and I've only made maybe 20 or 30 blades of various types at this point.)

One 1084 knife blade that I had Rockwell C tested came out to HRC 60 after a 400-degree, two-hour temper. There was a spot on the ricasso that was 65, even after tempering. (Uneven hardness isn't what I'm shooting for; I have a hot-spot in my forge that causes unevenness like this.)

I see using a real quench oil as similar to using high-grade gas in a performance car. You might be OK with 87 octane, but to really get the most out of your car, you need the stuff it was designed for.

No matter what quenchant you use, it's important to figure out how it works with your steels and your equipment. Try different temperatures for the quenchant and steel, and have samples tested. (I'm still trying to figure out what I did to that blade that hit HRC 65 after a 400-degree temper. I'm planning to do a batch of samples once I get my real forge from Darren in the next week or so... :) )

I want my customers to know they're getting a razor that is the best I can possibly make. That means that I have to be able to count on my heat-treatment process to deliver predictable results, and quenching oil is a big part of that equation.

Josh
 
Some have read that Parks says it can be used at room temp. I have some older papers (I am sorry I cannot locate them right now in my dissster known as an office) that suggested around 130F so that is what I heat to and get very good results. But I know guys to how go into it with 10XX series steel steels at room temp. I have seen wonderful katanas, wild activiy and all, done in room temp #50.
Thank Bro!!!!:thumbup:;):cool:
 
Thanks for all the feedback, and the information! I think I'll end up experimenting with a couple of different quenchants for different types of steel. Thanks again, ya'll:cool:
 
As someone wanting to switch over to a formulated oil, is AAA the best oil for O-1 (my primary steel choice right now)? And Parks 50 for faster quenching steels such as 10XX series?

--nathan
 
Well, I am now in another quandary. To warm or not to warm my P50. It seems so divided and my reading had lead me to believe room temperature. If Kevin say he gets good results at 130. I have to believe that is a good way to go because I believe he would have verified his results in a very good manner. But, then again he doesn't seem to believe there is a problem with the cooler application. HMMMMMMMMMMMMMM I guess I can't be to wrong either way.
 
For what it's worth, I'm using mine at 120-130 F for 1084. With such a short cooling curve on the 10XX steels, I figure they need all the help they can get.

My quenches always seem very gentle; there's no vibrating or popping or crackling or anything. Just a little bubbling.

One planned future test is doing a standard quench on a sample and then having it RC tested without tempering. :)

Josh
 
Back
Top